Optical sparse aperture imaging.

The resolution of a conventional diffraction-limited imaging system is proportional to its pupil diameter. A primary goal of sparse aperture imaging is to enhance resolution while minimizing the total light collection area; the latter being desirable, in part, because of the cost of large, monolithic apertures. Performance metrics are defined and used to evaluate several sparse aperture arrays constructed from multiple, identical, circular subapertures. Subaperture piston and/or tilt effects on image quality are also considered. We selected arrays with compact nonredundant autocorrelations first described by Golay. We vary both the number of subapertures and their relative spacings to arrive at an optimized array. We report the results of an experiment in which we synthesized an image from multiple subaperture pupil fields by masking a large lens with a Golay array. For this experiment we imaged a slant edge feature of an ISO12233 resolution target in order to measure the modulation transfer function. We note the contrast reduction inherent in images formed through sparse aperture arrays and demonstrate the use of a Wiener-Helstrom filter to restore contrast in our experimental images. Finally, we describe a method to synthesize images from multiple subaperture focal plane intensity images using a phase retrieval algorithm to obtain estimates of subaperture pupil fields. Experimental results from synthesizing an image of a point object from multiple subaperture images are presented, and weaknesses of the phase retrieval method for this application are discussed.

[1]  Eric Keto,et al.  The Shapes of Cross-Correlation Interferometers , 1997 .

[2]  Laurent M. Mugnier,et al.  Aperture configuration optimality criterion for phased arrays of optical telescopes , 1996 .

[3]  J. Fienup,et al.  Wave-front phase estimation from Fourier intensity measurements , 1989 .

[4]  J. Monnier Optical interferometry in astronomy , 2003, astro-ph/0307036.

[5]  J R Fienup,et al.  Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison. , 1982, Applied optics.

[6]  Steven K. Rogers,et al.  Two-point resolution criterion for multiaperture optical telescopes , 1988 .

[7]  Marcel J. E. Golay,et al.  Point Arrays Having Compact, Nonredundant Autocorrelations , 1971 .

[8]  M.P. Dierking,et al.  Resolution enhanced sparse aperture imaging , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[9]  James R. Fienup MTF and integration time versus fill factor for sparse-aperture imaging systems , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[10]  J W Goodman,et al.  Experiments in long-distance holographic imagery. , 1969, Applied optics.

[11]  Soon-Jo Chung,et al.  Design and implementation of sparse aperture imaging systems , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  C. Helstrom Image Restoration by the Method of Least Squares , 1967 .

[13]  James E. Harvey,et al.  Performance characteristics of phased array and thinned aperture optical telescopes , 1988 .

[14]  M Strojnik,et al.  Design of a diluted aperture by use of the practical cutoff frequency. , 1999, Applied optics.

[15]  Berge Tatian Method for Obtaining the Transfer Function from the Edge Response Function , 1965 .

[16]  James R. Fienup,et al.  Reconstruction of a complex-valued object from the modulus of its Fourier transform using a support constraint , 1987 .

[17]  Robert D. Fiete,et al.  Image quality of sparse-aperture designs for remote sensing , 2002 .