Topographic and edaphic effects on the distribution of terrestrially reproducing anurans in Central Amazonia: mesoscale spatial patterns

Many studies suggest that edaphic variables are major determinants of frog distributions. However, leaf-litter depth and soil characteristics are influenced by distance from streams, so the apparent relationship between edaphic characteristics and species distributions could be an artefact of the dependence of species on free water for reproduction. Therefore, we investigated the effect of edaphic variables on the mesoscale distribution of frog species not dependent on free water for reproduction. We evaluated the effects of soil texture, pH, slope, number of trees and leaf-litter volume on the distribution of nine terrestrially reproducing anuran species in the Reserva Ducke, a 100-km2 terra firme forest preserve in central Amazonia. Diurnal and nocturnal assemblages of anuran species were sampled in 72 plots systematically distributed across the reserve. We sampled the diurnal anuran assemblage by visual encounter in 250 × 1-m plots and the nocturnal assemblage in 250 × 20-m plots using both auditory and visual surveys. The majority of terrestrially breeding anuran species were influenced by topographic and/or edaphic variables, such as slope, soil clay content and pH. However, responses to environmental predictors differed among species. Most species occurred throughout all environmental gradients and relationships with soil characteristics were subtle, indicating that these species occur in the majority of habitats in Reserva Ducke. The results of this study indicate that terrestrially breeding frogs are habitat generalists that show little mesoscale beta diversity associated with habitat variation.

[1]  K. Linsenmair,et al.  Diversity erosion beyond the species level : Dramatic loss of functional diversity after selective logging in two tropical amphibian communities , 2006 .

[2]  N. Higuchi,et al.  Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonian Forest: Effects of soil and topography , 2006 .

[3]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Edaphic and Floristic Variation within a 1‐ha Plot of Lowland Amazonian Rain Forest 1 , 2006 .

[4]  Hanna Tuomisto,et al.  Effects of mesoscale environmental heterogeneity and dispersal limitation on floristic variation in rain forest ferns , 2006 .

[5]  M. Rödel,et al.  ANTHROPOGENICALLY INDUCED CHANGES OF PREDICTABILITY IN TROPICAL ANURAN ASSEMBLAGES , 2005 .

[6]  W. Magnusson,et al.  Mesoscale distribution patterns of Amazonian understorey herbs in relation to topography, soil and watersheds , 2005 .

[7]  W. Magnusson,et al.  Spatial patterns in the understorey shrub genus Psychotria in central Amazonia: effects of distance and topography , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[8]  J. Watling Edaphically-biased distributions of amphibians and reptiles in a lowland tropical rainforest , 2005 .

[9]  C. Haddad,et al.  Reproductive Modes in Frogs and Their Unexpected Diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil , 2005 .

[10]  Bart Kruijt,et al.  Variation of carbon and nitrogen cycling processes along a topographic gradient in a central Amazonian forest , 2004 .

[11]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Floristic patterns along a 43‐km long transect in an Amazonian rain forest , 2003 .

[12]  H. Vasconcelos,et al.  Influence of Topography on the Distribution of Ground-Dwelling Ants in an Amazonian Forest , 2003 .

[13]  Tiffany M. Doan Which Methods Are Most Effective for Surveying Rain Forest Herpetofauna? , 2003 .

[14]  J. Vonesh Patterns of Richness and Abundance in a Tropical African Leaf-litter Herpetofauna1 , 2001 .

[15]  Peter E. Killips Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians. A Global Perspective , 2001 .

[16]  E. Tanner,et al.  The Influence of Topography on Tree Growth, Mortality, and Recruitment in a Tropical Montane Forest 1 , 2000 .

[17]  A. Giaretta,et al.  Diversity and Abundance of Litter Frogs in a Montane Forest of Southeastern Brazil: Seasonal and Altitudinal Changes 1 , 1999 .

[18]  David B. Clark,et al.  EDAPHIC FACTORS AND THE LANDSCAPE-SCALE DISTRIBUTIONS OF TROPICAL RAIN FOREST TREES , 1999 .

[19]  J. Woinarski,et al.  Distribution patterns of vertebrates in relation to an extensive rainfall gradient and variation in soil texture in the tropical savannas of the Northern Territory, Australia , 1999, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[20]  E. Webb,et al.  Effects of topography on rainforest tree community structure and diversity in American Samoa, and implications for frugivore and nectarivore populations , 1999 .

[21]  P. Pearman Correlates of Amphibian Diversity in an Altered Landscape of Amazonian Ecuador , 1997 .

[22]  W. Heyer,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. , 1995 .

[23]  J. Heinen Comparisons of the Leaf Litter Herpetofauna in Abandoned Cacao Plantations and Primary Rain Forest in Costa Rica: Some Implications for Faunal Restoration1 , 1992 .

[24]  W. Allmon A plot study of forest floor litter frogs, Central Amazon, Brazil , 1991, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[25]  G. Rosenberg Habitat Specialization and Foraging Behavior by Birds of Amazonian River Islands in Northeastern Peru , 1990 .

[26]  B. Crother,et al.  Elevational Patterns of Species Richness, Evenness, and Abundance of the Costa Rican Leaf-Litter Herpetofauna , 1989 .

[27]  R. L. Wyman Soil Acidity and Moisture and the Distribution of Amphibians in Five Forests of Southcentral New York , 1988 .

[28]  R. L. Wyman,et al.  Soil Acidity Affects Distribution, Behavior, and Physiology of the Salamader Plethodon Cinereus. , 1987, Ecology.

[29]  Y. Lucas,et al.  On the genesis of the soil mantle of the region of Manaus, Central Amazonia, Brazil , 1987, Experientia.

[30]  S. Lieberman ECOLOGY OF THE LEAF LITTER HERPETOFAUNA OF A NEOTROPICAL RAIN FOREST: LA SELVA, COSTA RICA , 1986 .

[31]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Relevance of the equilibrium theory of island biogeography and species-area relations to conservation with a case from Amazonia , 1986 .

[32]  F. Kahn,et al.  The palm community in a forest of central Amazonia, Brazil. , 1985 .

[33]  J. Lescure,et al.  Relationships between soil and vegetation in a tropical rain forest in French Guiana , 1985 .

[34]  B. A. Pierce Acid Tolerance in Amphibians , 1985 .

[35]  L. Emmons Geographic variation in densities and diversities of non-flying mammals in Amazonia , 1984 .

[36]  J. M. D. Santos,et al.  Estudos climatologicos da reserva florestal ducke-manaus-am. Iv. Precipitacao , 1981 .

[37]  N. Nova,et al.  Estudos climatológicos da Reserva Florestal Ducke, Manaus, AM. III. Evapotranspiração () , 1979 .

[38]  N. Scott The herpetofauna of forest litter plots from Cameroon , 1977 .

[39]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Organization of Contiguous Communities of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand , 1977 .

[40]  M. Rödel,et al.  COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY AND STRUCTURE OF TROPICAL LEAF-LITTER ANURANS , 2006 .

[41]  E. Tanner,et al.  The Influence of Topography on Tree Growth, Mortality, and Recruitment in a Tropical Montane Forest1 , 2000 .

[42]  L. G. Lohmann,et al.  Flora da Reserva Ducke. Guia de identificacao das plantas vasculares de uma floresta de terra-firme na Amazonia Central , 1999 .

[43]  D. Simberloff,et al.  An historical interpretation of habitat use by frogs in a Central Amazonian Forest , 1996 .

[44]  P. Catling,et al.  Studies of the ground-dwelling mammals of eucalypt forests in South-eastern New South Wales : the effect of habitat variables on distribution and abundance , 1995 .