Responses to positive results from suspicionless random drug tests in US public school districts.

BACKGROUND Little is known about the context in which school-based suspicionless random drug testing (SRDT) occurs. The primary purpose of the current study was to describe school districts' responses to students' first positive result in districts with SRDT programs. METHODS Data were collected in spring 2005 from 1612 drug prevention coordinators in a nationally representative sample of 1922 school districts (83.9% response rate), of which 205 districts reported SRDT in high school grades. RESULTS Respondents reported an array of consequences for students with an initial positive SRDT, including requiring parents or guardians to meet with school officials (88.4%) and requiring students to participate in an education, counseling, or treatment program (60.8%). However, some districts also reported consequences contraindicated by federal advisory guides, such as notifying law enforcement officials (45.1%) and suspending the student from an athletic team (65.0%) or from school (31.0%). Some respondents may have conflated their districts' responses to for cause and random tests. Districts generally had available key services for students testing positive, including professional counseling for substance use problems (87.3%) and referrals to counseling services (91.9%). CONCLUSIONS More understanding is needed of schools' responses to students who test positive following the administration of SRDT, available advisory guides concerning best practices should be more effectively disseminated, and appropriate training and technical assistance should be available to schools with SRDTs.

[1]  George S. Yacoubian,et al.  Random drug testing in US public school districts. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[2]  Kenneth T. Wilburn,et al.  Pearls and Pitfalls in Evaluating a Student Assistance Program: A Five-Year Case Study , 2007, Journal of drug education.

[3]  S. Levy,et al.  The national debate on drug testing in schools. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[4]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Outcomes of a prospective trial of student-athlete drug testing: the Student Athlete Testing Using Random Notification (SATURN) study. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[5]  Marci F Hertz,et al.  Healthy and safe school environment, Part I: Results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. , 2007, The Journal of school health.

[6]  J. Knight,et al.  Testing for Drugs of Abuse in Children and Adolescents: Addendum—Testing in Schools and at Home , 2007, Pediatrics.

[7]  R. Catalano,et al.  The effect of school suspensions and arrests on subsequent adolescent antisocial behavior in Australia and the United States. , 2006, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[8]  L. Johnston,et al.  School Tobacco Control Policies Related to Students’ Smoking and Attitudes Toward Smoking: National Survey Results, 1999-2000 , 2005, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[9]  Brian J. Jennings,et al.  Adolescent Attitudes toward Random Drug Testing in Schools , 2005, Journal of drug education.

[10]  Katherine Pohlman,et al.  A Practice Perspective , 2005 .

[11]  Charles B. Fleming,et al.  The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: findings from the Social Development Research Group. , 2004, The Journal of school health.

[12]  C. McNeely,et al.  School connectedness and the transition into and out of health-risk behavior among adolescents: a comparison of social belonging and teacher support. , 2004, The Journal of school health.

[13]  S. Ennett,et al.  Who's Calling the Shots? Decision-Makers and the Adoption of Effective School-Based Substance use Prevention Curricula , 2004, Journal of drug education.

[14]  A. Verma Criticisms of SATURN Mirror Criticisms of Any Mandatory Student Drug-Testing Policy , 2004, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[15]  D. Louria Mandatory Drug Testing of High School Athletes: Unethical Evaluation, Unethical Policy , 2004, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[16]  Joseph E. Zins,et al.  Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[17]  Patrick M O'Malley,et al.  Relationship between student illicit drug use and school drug-testing policies. , 2003, The Journal of school health.

[18]  S. Ennett,et al.  The Prevalence of Effective Substance Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools , 2002, Prevention Science.

[19]  R. Verdugo Race-Ethnicity, Social Class, and Zero-Tolerance Policies , 2002 .

[20]  J. Nonnemaker,et al.  Promoting school connectedness: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. , 2002, The Journal of school health.

[21]  Shelton M. Jones,et al.  Survey methodology for studying substance use prevention programs in schools , 2002 .

[22]  D. Gottfredson,et al.  What Schools Do to Prevent Problem Behavior and Promote Safe Environments , 2001 .

[23]  David B. Wilson,et al.  School-Based Prevention of Problem Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[24]  C. Lewis,et al.  Effects of the Child Development Project on Students' Drug Use and Other Problem Behaviors , 2000, Journal of Primary Prevention.

[25]  R. Skiba,et al.  Zero tolerance, zero evidence: an analysis of school disciplinary practice. , 2000, New directions for youth development.

[26]  P. Ludwig-Beymer From a Practice Perspective , 1999, Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society.

[27]  Jeanne L. Surface,et al.  Effectiveness of Student Assistance Programs in Nebraska Schools , 1999, Journal of drug education.

[28]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  The power of policy: the relationship of smoking policy to adolescent smoking. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[29]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Drug testing athletes to prevent substance abuse: background and pilot study results of the SATURN (Student Athlete Testing Using Random Notification) study. , 2003, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[30]  L. Johnston,et al.  Drug Testing in Schools: Policies, Practices, and Association with Student Drug Use. YES Occasional Papers. Paper 2. , 2003 .

[31]  Michael Berry,et al.  Office of National Drug Control Policy , 2002 .

[32]  Robert S. Taylor Compensating Behavior and the Drug Testing of High School Athletes , 1997 .

[33]  H. Shane,et al.  Schools and delinquency , 1972 .