Lone Geniuses in Popular Science

Popular accounts of scientific discoveries diverge from scholarly accounts, stripping off hedges and promoting short-term social consequences. This case study illustrates how the “horse-race” framing of popular accounts devalues the collective sharing, challenging, and extending of scientific work. In her best-selling Longitude, Dava Sobel (1996) depicts John Harrison's 18th-century invention of a marine chronometer, a ground-breaking precision instrument that eventually allowed sailors to calculate their longitude at sea, as an unequal race with Harrison as beleaguered hero. Sobel represents the demands of the Board of Longitude to test and replicate the chronometer as the obstructionist machinations of an academic elite. Her framing underreports the feasibility of the chronometer and its astronomical rival, the lunar distance method, which each satisfied different criteria. That readers accept Sobel's framing is indicated by an analysis of 187 reviews posted on Amazon.com, suggesting that popular representation of science fuels cynicism in popular and academic forums.

[1]  W. Campbell.  The Worm and the Tumor: Reflections on Fibiger's Nobel Prize , 2015 .

[2]  Philip Kitcher,et al.  Precis of The Advancement of Science@@@The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. , 1995 .

[3]  Davida Charney,et al.  Moving beyond the Moment , 2001 .

[4]  D. Howse.  Nevil Maskelyne, the seaman's astronomer , 1989 .

[5]  H. Klein,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations , 2002 .

[6]  Davida Charney.  Empiricism Is not a Four-Letter Word. , 1996 .

[7]  William R. Sandberg,et al.  Friendship within Entrepreneurial Teams and its Association with Team and Venture Performance , 2000 .

[8]  Greg Myers,et al.  The Social Construction of Two Biologists' Proposals , 1985 .

[9]  K. Popper,et al.  The Open Society and Its Enemies , 1946 .

[10]  Rosslyn Reed.  (Un-)Professional discourse? , 2001 .

[11]  Dava Sobel,et al.  The Illustrated Longitude , 1998 .

[12]  J. Matthews.  Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life , 1996 .

[13]  K. E. Rowan.  Moving beyond the What to the Why: Differences in Professional and Popular Science Writing , 1989 .

[14]  R. Baldwin,et al.  The Quest for Longitude , 1998 .

[15]  C. Geisler,et al.  Novelty in Academic Writing , 1989 .

[16]  P. Kitcher,et al.  The advancement of science : science without legend, objectivity without illusions , 1995 .

[17]  Angelo Melino,et al.  The Effects of Congressional Appropriation Committee Membership on the Distribution of Federal Research Funding to Universities , 2003 .

[18]  Tracy Kidder,et al.  Soul of a New Machine , 1981 .

[19]  James D. Watson,et al.  The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA , 1968 .

[20]  L. Stewart.  A Meaning for Machines: Modernity, Utility, and the Eighteenth‐Century British Public* , 1998, The Journal of Modern History.

[21]  Charles Bazerman,et al.  Persuasion at a Distance. (Book Reviews: Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science.) , 1990 .

[22]  Jeanne Fahnestock,et al.  Accommodating Science , 1986 .

[23]  James Gleick,et al.  Chaos, Making a New Science , 1987 .

[24]  Alan W Gross,et al.  Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Dwight Atkinson , 2001 .

[25]  K. Jamieson,et al.  Rhetorical Convergence and Issue Knowledge in the 2000 Presidential Election , 2003 .

[26]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology , 1988 .

[27]  Martin H. Levinson.  Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time , 1997 .

[28]  G. Myers.  Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries , 2003 .