Muscle Synergies Heavily Influence the Neural Control of Arm Endpoint Stiffness and Energy Consumption

Much debate has arisen from research on muscle synergies with respect to both limb impedance control and energy consumption. Studies of limb impedance control in the context of reaching movements and postural tasks have produced divergent findings, and this study explores whether the use of synergies by the central nervous system (CNS) can resolve these findings and also provide insights on mechanisms of energy consumption. In this study, we phrase these debates at the conceptual level of interactions between neural degrees of freedom and tasks constraints. This allows us to examine the ability of experimentally-observed synergies—correlated muscle activations—to control both energy consumption and the stiffness component of limb endpoint impedance. In our nominal 6-muscle planar arm model, muscle synergies and the desired size, shape, and orientation of endpoint stiffness ellipses, are expressed as linear constraints that define the set of feasible muscle activation patterns. Quadratic programming allows us to predict whether and how energy consumption can be minimized throughout the workspace of the limb given those linear constraints. We show that the presence of synergies drastically decreases the ability of the CNS to vary the properties of the endpoint stiffness and can even preclude the ability to minimize energy. Furthermore, the capacity to minimize energy consumption—when available—can be greatly affected by arm posture. Our computational approach helps reconcile divergent findings and conclusions about task-specific regulation of endpoint stiffness and energy consumption in the context of synergies. But more generally, these results provide further evidence that the benefits and disadvantages of muscle synergies go hand-in-hand with the structure of feasible muscle activation patterns afforded by the mechanics of the limb and task constraints. These insights will help design experiments to elucidate the interplay between synergies and the mechanisms of learning, plasticity, versatility and pathology in neuromuscular systems.

[1]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Defining feasible bounds on muscle activation in a redundant biomechanical task: practical implications of redundancy. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  James C. Houk,et al.  Cerebellar learning for control of a two-link arm in muscle space , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  The neural origin of muscle synergies , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[6]  Lena H Ting,et al.  A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Edmund Y. S. Chao,et al.  GRAPHICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE SOLUTION TO THE REDUNDANT PROBLEM IN BIOMECHANICS. , 1978 .

[8]  Stacie A. Chvatal,et al.  Review and perspective: neuromechanical considerations for predicting muscle activation patterns for movement , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[9]  M. Tresch,et al.  The case for and against muscle synergies , 2022 .

[10]  C. Sherrington,et al.  REFLEX INHIBITION AS A FACTOR IN THE CO‐ORDINATION OF MOVEMENTS AND POSTURES , 1913 .

[11]  Simon Giszter,et al.  Primitives, premotor drives, and pattern generation: a combined computational and neuroethological perspective. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[12]  D. M. Guthrie Neuroethology: Nerve Cells and the Natural Behavior of Animals, Jeffrey M. Camhi. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. (1984), xv, +416. Price £24.00 , 1984 .

[13]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II—Implementation , 1985 .

[14]  L. Selen,et al.  Impedance Control Reduces Instability That Arises from Motor Noise , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Francisco J. Valero-Cuevas,et al.  Fundamentals of Neuromechanics , 2015 .

[16]  H. Gomi,et al.  Multijoint muscle regulation mechanisms examined by measured human arm stiffness and EMG signals. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Shuguang Huang,et al.  The bounds and realization of spatial compliances achieved with simple serial elastic mechanisms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[18]  Wendy M Murray,et al.  Muscle short-range stiffness can be used to estimate the endpoint stiffness of the human arm. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Dynamical Movement Primitives: Learning Attractor Models for Motor Behaviors , 2013, Neural Computation.

[20]  T. Milner Contribution of geometry and joint stiffness to mechanical stability of the human arm , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  J. Ewert,et al.  Neuroethology , 1980, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  F. Zajac,et al.  Large index-fingertip forces are produced by subject-independent patterns of muscle excitation. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  E Burdet,et al.  A method for measuring endpoint stiffness during multi-joint arm movements. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[25]  Hiroaki Kobayashi,et al.  On Tendon-Driven Robotic Mechanisms with Redundant Tendons , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[26]  D. Ostry,et al.  Learning to control arm stiffness under static conditions. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas,et al.  A mathematical approach to the mechanical capabilities of limbs and fingers. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[28]  Y. Koike,et al.  A myokinetic arm model for estimating joint torque and stiffness from EMG signals during maintained posture. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Definition and classification of hyperkinetic movements in childhood , 2010, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[30]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Jason J Kutch,et al.  Muscle redundancy does not imply robustness to muscle dysfunction. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Muscle synergies in neuroscience and robotics: from input-space to task-space perspectives , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[33]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Challenges and New Approaches to Proving the Existence of Muscle Synergies of Neural Origin , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  G. Loeb Overcomplete musculature or underspecified tasks? , 2000, Motor control.

[35]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance control - An approach to manipulation. I - Theory. II - Implementation. III - Applications , 1985 .

[36]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Effective force control by muscle synergies , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[37]  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas,et al.  Neural Control of Motion-to-Force Transitions with the Fingertip , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[39]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Learning to push and learning to move: the adaptive control of contact forces , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[40]  E. Zehr,et al.  What functions do reflexes serve during human locomotion? , 1999, Progress in Neurobiology.

[41]  K. Lynch,et al.  The Separate Neural Control of Hand Movements and Contact Forces , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Sybert H. Stroeve,et al.  Impedance characteristics of a neuromusculoskeletal model of the human arm I. Posture control , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[43]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Impedance control is selectively tuned to multiple directions of movement , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas,et al.  Maximal Voluntary Fingertip Force Production Is Not Limited by Movement Speed in Combined Motion and Force Tasks , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Definition and Classification of Negative Motor Signs in Childhood , 2006, Pediatrics.

[46]  E. Perreault,et al.  Modeling short-range stiffness of feline lower hindlimb muscles. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  Simon F Giszter,et al.  Motor primitives—new data and future questions , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[48]  H. Hultborn Spinal reflexes, mechanisms and concepts: From Eccles to Lundberg and beyond , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[49]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Endpoint Stiffness of the Arm Is Directionally Tuned to Instability in the Environment , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[51]  Lena H. Ting,et al.  Erratum to 'Defining feasible bounds on muscle activation in a redundant biomechanical task; practical implications of redundancy' [J. Biomech. 46/7 (2013) 1363-1368] , 2013 .

[52]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[53]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The control of stable postures in the multijoint arm , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  C W Spoor,et al.  Balancing a force on the fingertip of a two-dimensional finger model without intrinsic muscles. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[55]  Prilutsky Muscle coordination: the discussion continues , 2000, Motor control.

[56]  P. Crago,et al.  Effects of voluntary force generation on the elastic components of endpoint stiffness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  Wendy M Murray,et al.  Biomechanical constraints on the feedforward regulation of endpoint stiffness. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[59]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Compositionality of optimal control laws , 2009, NIPS.

[60]  M. Kawato,et al.  Impedance control balances stability with metabolically costly muscle activation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  Yoky Matsuoka,et al.  Biological stiffness control strategies for the Anatomically Correct Testbed (ACT) hand , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[62]  W. Rymer,et al.  Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  Harvey Lipkin,et al.  Synthesis of Cartesian stiffness for robotic applications , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[64]  T. Flash,et al.  Human arm stiffness characteristics during the maintenance of posture , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[65]  B A Cohn,et al.  Exploring the high-dimensional structure of muscle redundancy via subject-specific and generic musculoskeletal models. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[66]  Eric J Perreault,et al.  Voluntary control of static endpoint stiffness during force regulation tasks. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  Keng Peng Tee,et al.  Concurrent adaptation of force and impedance in the redundant muscle system , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[68]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[69]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.