Constrained Engineering Design Optimization Using a Hybrid Bi-objective Evolutionary-Classical Methodology

Constrained engineering design optimization problems are usually computationally expensive due to non-linearity and non convexity of the constraint functions. Penalty function methods are found to be quite popular due to their simplicity and ease of implementation, but they require an appropriate value of the penalty parameter. Bi-objective approach is one of the methods to handle constraints, in which the minimization of the constraint violation is included as an additional objective. In this paper, constrained engineering design optimization problems are solved by combining the penalty function approach with a bi-objective evolutionary approach which play complementary roles to help each other. The penalty parameter is approximated using bi-objective approach and a classical method is used for the solution of unconstrained penalized function. In this methodology, we have also eliminated the local search parameter which was needed in our previous study.

[1]  Sanyou Zeng,et al.  Advances in Computation and Intelligence, Second International Symposium, ISICA 2007, Wuhan, China, September 21-23, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, ISICA.

[2]  K. Deb An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[3]  Subbarao Kambhampati,et al.  Evolutionary Computing , 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Hyun Myung,et al.  Hybrid Interior-Langrangian Penalty Based Evolutionary Optimization , 1998, Evolutionary Programming.

[5]  Y. Ao,et al.  An Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm to Solve Constrained Optimization Problems in Engineering Design , 2010 .

[6]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[7]  Tapabrata Ray,et al.  Society and civilization: An optimization algorithm based on the simulation of social behavior , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and accurate solution of constrained optimization problems using a hybrid bi-objective and penalty function approach , 2010, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[9]  Patrick D. Surry,et al.  A Multi-objective Approach to Constrained Optimisation of Gas Supply Networks: the COMOGA Method , 1995, Evolutionary Computing, AISB Workshop.

[10]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Hybrid Evolutionary Multi-objective and SQP Based Procedure for Constrained Optimization , 2007, ISICA.

[11]  Wenjian Luo,et al.  Differential evolution with dynamic stochastic selection for constrained optimization , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems , 2000 .

[13]  A. E. Eiben,et al.  Evolutionary Programming VII , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.