Personalised image-based templates for intra-operative guidance

Abstract The high rate of unplanned perforation, poor fixation, and nerve injury with freehand pedicle screw insertion has led to the use of image-guided navigation systems. Although these improve accuracy, they have several drawbacks that could be overcome by using image-based drilling guide templates. The accuracy of such templates was tested in a cadaveric study of screw placement in the lumbar, thoracic, and cervical regions of the spine. The dimensional stability with autoclaving of duraform polyamide, to be used for manufacturing the guides, was first determined using test specimens. Computed tomography (CT) images were acquired of 4 cadaveric spines, and placement of 4 cervical, 32 thoracic, and 14 lumbar screws was planned. Eighteen personalized drilling guide templates, in four different designs, were built. Orthopaedic surgeons experienced in the freehand techniques used the templates. CT images were acquired to assess placement position with respect to the pedicle. Duraform polyamide was found to be unaffected by sterilization. Two of the template designs facilitated the placement of 20/20 screws without error. Templates can lead to successful screw placement, even in small pedicles, providing their design is optimized for the application area, e.g. with enhanced rotational stabilization.

[1]  Eric Keppel,et al.  Approximating Complex Surfaces by Triangulation of Contour Lines , 1975, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[2]  S. Esses,et al.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. , 1993, Spine.

[3]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  P Merloz,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Image Guided Techniques , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Y. Rampersaud,et al.  v) Frameless spinal stereotaxis , 1998 .

[6]  S P Hughes,et al.  Infection in the operating room. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  P. Vock,et al.  Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. , 1999, Spine.

[8]  S. Hughes,et al.  Infection in the operating room. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  T. Laine,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[10]  K. Takaoka,et al.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion: assessment of safety and accuracy with computer-assisted image guidance. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[11]  P A Webb,et al.  A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques in the medical and biomedical sector , 2000, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[12]  H. Yuan,et al.  Use of a guide device to place pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: a cadaveric study. Technical note. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  A. Prescher,et al.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery With Individual Templates and Comparison to Conventional Operation Method , 2001, Spine.

[14]  D J Quint,et al.  Stereotactic Navigation for Placement of Pedicle Screws in the Thoracic Spine , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[15]  D. Simon,et al.  Accuracy Requirements for Image-Guided Spinal Pedicle Screw Placement , 2001, Spine.

[16]  Kee D. Kim,et al.  Computer-Assisted Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement: An In Vitro Feasibility Study , 2001, Spine.

[17]  H Labelle,et al.  Feasibility study of patient-specific surgical templates for the fixation of pedicle screws. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  Ganesh Rao,et al.  Comparison of computerized tomography and direct visualization in thoracic pedicle screw placement. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.