Ultrasonic properties of random media under uniaxial loading.

Acoustic properties of two types of soft tissue-like media were measured as a function of compressive strain. Samples were subjected to uniaxial strains up to 40% along the axis of the transducer beam. Measurements were analyzed to test a common assumption made when using pulse-echo waveforms to track motion in soft tissues--that local properties of wave propagation and scattering are invariant under deformation. Violations of this assumption have implications for elasticity imaging procedures and could provide new opportunities for identifying the sources of backscatter in biological media such as breast parenchyma. We measured speeds of sound, attenuation coefficients, and echo spectra in compressed phantoms containing randomly positioned scatterers either stiffer or softer than the surrounding gelatin. Only the echo spectra of gel media with soft scatterers varied significantly during compression. Centroids of the echo spectra were found to be shifted to higher frequencies in proportion to the applied strain up to 10%, and increased monotonically up to 40% at a rate depending on the scatterer size. Centroid measurements were accurately modeled by assuming incoherent scattering from oblate spheroids with an eccentricity that increases with strain. While spectral shifts can be accurately modeled, recovery of lost echo coherence does not seem possible. Consequently, spectral variance during compression may ultimately limit the amount of strain that can be applied between two data fields in heterogeneous media such as lipid-filled tissues. It also appears to partially explain why strain images often produce greater echo decorrelation in tissues than in commonly used graphite-gelatin test phantoms.

[1]  F. Dunn,et al.  Compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. II. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Insana,et al.  Maximum-likelihood approach to strain imaging using ultrasound , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  K. W. Cattermole The Fourier Transform and its Applications , 1965 .

[4]  F. Dunn,et al.  Letter: Correlation of echographic visualizability of tissue with biological composition and physiological state. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. G. Miller,et al.  A proposed microscopic elastic wave theory for ultrasonic backscatter from myocardial tissue. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[7]  Michel Bertrand,et al.  Lagrangian speckle model and tissue-motion estimation-theory [ultrasonography] , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  D J Coleman,et al.  Correlation of Microcirculation Architecture with Ultrasound Backscatter Parameters of Uveal Melanoma , 1995, European journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Phantom materials for elastography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  N. Tschoegl The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior , 1989 .

[11]  E L Madsen,et al.  Oil-in-gelatin dispersions for use as ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials. , 1982, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  R C Waag,et al.  Spectral power determinations of compressibility and density variations in model media and calf liver using ultrasound. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[14]  K. Parker,et al.  Absorption and attenuation in soft tissues. II. Experimental results , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  C R Hill,et al.  The use of angular acoustic scattering measurements to estimate structural parameters of human and animal tissues. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  T. Senior,et al.  Electromagnetic and Acoustic Scattering by Simple Shapes , 1969 .

[17]  Robert C. Waag,et al.  A Review of Tissue Characterization from Ultrasonic Scattering , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Martin Greenspan,et al.  Tables of the Speed of Sound in Water , 1959 .

[19]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Strain Imaging with a Deformable Mesh , 1999, Ultrasonic imaging.

[20]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Describing small-scale structure in random media using pulse-echo ultrasound. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1987 .

[22]  G G Cox,et al.  Effects of endothelin-1 on renal microvasculature measured using quantitative ultrasound. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Relationship of Ultrasonic Spectral Parameters to Features of Tissue Microstructure , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[25]  M. Bilgen,et al.  Deformation models and correlation analysis in elastography. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Akira Ishimaru,et al.  Wave propagation and scattering in random media , 1997 .

[27]  P. Morse,et al.  Methods of theoretical physics , 1955 .

[28]  Colin Deane,et al.  Estimation of blood velocities using ultrasound: a signal processing approach:Jorgen Arendt Jensen, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0 521 46484 6, 317pp, £45.00 ($69.95) , 1997 .