Collapse capacity of modular steel buildings subject to module loss scenarios: The role of inter-module connections

Abstract In modular buildings made of volumetric units, robust structural action may be established by considering various scenarios for localisation of damage, corresponding to loss of supports at the ground floor, such as notional removal of ground floor modules. This paper studies the role of inter-module connections in resisting capacity of modular steel buildings against gravity-induced progressive collapse scenarios, through removing individual or combinations of entire modules at the ground floor. For this purpose, some typical modular buildings are modelled using the macro-model based finite element method. In order to investigate the role of inter-modular connections solely and separate from the effects of other elements, the modules are assumed volumetric rigid bodies, connected through horizontal and vertical interconnections, which are modelled employing translational axial and shear nonlinear springs. Different module loss scenarios are instantaneously imposed to the building models, and their nonlinear dynamic response is monitored in the context of alternate path method analysis. Then the ultimate collapse capacity of the modular buildings along with the collapse mechanism and failure modes are determined through the nonlinear static pushdown analysis. It is shown that the modular buildings possess considerable collapse resisting capacity and are able to offer high level of robustness compared to their conventional counterparts.

[1]  J.Y.R. Liew,et al.  Steel concrete composite systems for modular construction of high-rise buildings , 2019 .

[2]  Jianqiao Ye,et al.  An evaluation of modelling approaches and column removal time on progressive collapse of building , 2019, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[3]  Kirk A. Marchand,et al.  Alternate Path Method in Progressive Collapse Analysis: Variation of Dynamic and Nonlinear Load Increase Factors , 2012 .

[4]  Hamid R. Ronagh,et al.  Numerical models for lateral behaviour analysis of cold-formed steel framed walls: State of the art, evaluation and challenges , 2019, Thin-Walled Structures.

[5]  Gang Wu,et al.  Progressive collapse performance analysis of precast reinforced concrete structures , 2019, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings.

[6]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss — Part I: Simplified assessment framework , 2008 .

[7]  Pathmanathan Rajeev,et al.  Numerical study on the effects of diaphragm stiffness and strength on the seismic response of multi-story modular buildings , 2018 .

[8]  Y. S. Chua,et al.  Robustness of Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric Construction (PPVC) High-rise Building , 2018 .

[9]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Automated spatial design of multi-story modular buildings using a unified matrix method , 2017 .

[10]  Hamed Saffari,et al.  Dynamic Increase factor based on residual strength to assess progressive collapse , 2017 .

[11]  Meng-Hao Tsai,et al.  Assessment of Analytical Load and Dynamic Increase Factors for Progressive Collapse Analysis of Building Frames , 2012 .

[12]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Seismic collapse assessment of a hybrid cold-formed hot-rolled steel building , 2019 .

[13]  M. P. Byfield,et al.  Strain rate dependent component based connection modelling for use in non-linear dynamic progressive collapse analysis , 2013 .

[14]  Hong Hao,et al.  Structural response of modular buildings – An overview , 2018 .

[15]  Chris I. Goodier,et al.  Design in Modular Construction , 2014 .

[16]  Wahid Ferdous,et al.  New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings – A state-of-the-art review , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[17]  Massimiliano Ferraioli,et al.  A modal pushdown procedure for progressive collapse analysis of steel frame structures , 2019, Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

[18]  Halil Sezen,et al.  Evaluation, modeling, and analysis of shipping container building structures , 2012 .

[19]  Fulvio Parisi,et al.  Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[20]  Lip H. Teh,et al.  Conceptual design optimization of rectilinear building frames: A knapsack problem approach , 2015 .

[21]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Progressive collapse-resisting capacity of modular mega-frame buildings , 2013 .

[22]  Lip H. Teh,et al.  Shape optimization of thin-walled steel sections using graph theory and ACO algorithm , 2014 .

[23]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Lateral force resisting systems in lightweight steel frames : recent research advances , 2018 .

[24]  Wensu Chen,et al.  Review of bolted inter-module connections in modular steel buildings , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[25]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Computational Simulation of Gravity-Induced Progressive Collapse of Steel-Frame Buildings: Current Trends and Future Research Needs , 2014 .

[26]  Feng Fu,et al.  Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method , 2009 .

[27]  Maged A. Youssef,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Modular Steel Buildings , 2009 .

[28]  Ahmed Y. Elghazouli,et al.  Contribution of secondary frames to the mitigation of collapse in steel buildings subjected to extreme loads , 2016 .

[29]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Interlocking system for enhancing the integrity of multi-storey modular buildings , 2018 .

[30]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Identification of Factors and Decision Analysis of the Level of Modularization in Building Construction , 2018, Journal of Architectural Engineering.

[31]  Xiaoxiong Zha,et al.  Theoretical and experimental studies on in-plane stiffness of integrated container structure , 2016 .

[32]  Min Liu.  A new dynamic increase factor for nonlinear static alternate path analysis of building frames against progressive collapse , 2013 .