论文信息 - Public understanding of futures & foresight science: A reply to Chermack’s response - 字舞流文

Public understanding of futures & foresight science: A reply to Chermack’s response

Nicholas J. Rowland | Matthew J. Spaniol

[1] T. Chermack. Response to Spaniol and Rowland: “Defining Scenario” , 2019, FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE.

[2] V. Pacini,et al. The links between French school of foresight and organizational learning: An assessment of developments in the last ten years , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[3] George Wright,et al. Submission and citation practices in Futures & Foresight Science and our commitment to integrity and ethics , 2018, Futures & Foresight Science.

[4] Nicholas J. Rowland,et al. Defining scenario , 2018, Futures & Foresight Science.

[5] Nicholas J. Rowland,et al. Social foundation of scenario planning , 2017 .

[6] Nicholas J. Rowland,et al. The scenario planning paradox , 2017 .

[7] Nicholas J. Rowland,et al. The future multiple , 2015 .

[8] Nicholas J. Rowland,et al. Beware of Allies! , 2013 .

[9] George Wright,et al. The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[10] Paula E. Stephan. Robert K. Merton's perspective on priority and the provision of the public good knowledge , 2004, Scientometrics.

[11] Michel Godet,et al. The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning - Tools and Pitfalls , 2000 .

[12] B. Lewenstein. The meaning of `public understanding of science' in the United States after World War II , 1992 .