Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures : An ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations

a Primer Servicio de Urología, Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Atenas, Atenas, Greece b Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas y Quirúrgicas, Clínica de Urología, Universidad de Verona, Verona, Italy c Martini-Clinic, Centro de Cáncer de Próstata, Universidad de Hamburgo-Eppendorf, Hamburgo, Germany d Servicio de Urología, Landesklinikum Korneuburg, Korneuburg, Austria e Departamento Académico de Urología, Hospital Pitié Salpétrière, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Universidad de París VI, París, France f Servicio de Urología, Klinikum Dortmund GmbH, Dortmund, Germany

[1]  J. Deprest,et al.  An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery , 2011, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[2]  S. Fosså,et al.  Do perceptions of adverse events differ between patients and physicians? Findings from a randomized, controlled trial of radical treatment for prostate cancer. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[3]  C. Ko,et al.  Effect of Postdischarge Morbidity and Mortality on Comparisons of Hospital Surgical Quality , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[4]  D. Hahnloser,et al.  Quality Assessment in Surgery: Riding a Lame Horse , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[5]  M. Graefen.  The modified Clavien system: a plea for a standardized reporting system for surgical complications. , 2010, European urology.

[6]  K. Itani,et al.  Evaluation of healthcare quality: a tale of three giants. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[7]  W. Hawkins,et al.  The Accordion Severity Grading System of Surgical Complications , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[8]  J. Moul,et al.  Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2008, European urology.

[9]  Wadih Arap,et al.  Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  D. Gouma,et al.  What is a Surgical Complication? , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[11]  P. Clavien,et al.  Surgeon’s Intuition: Is It Enough to Assess Patients’ Surgical Risk? , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  S. Donat.  Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. , 2007, Urology.

[13]  A. Morris,et al.  Reoperation as a Quality Indicator in Colorectal Surgery: A Population-Based Analysis , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[14]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[15]  M. Gonen,et al.  Impact of steatosis on perioperative outcome following hepatic resection , 2003, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[16]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. , 2003, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[17]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  W. Henderson,et al.  The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Non-Veterans Administration Hospitals: Initial Demonstration of Feasibility , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[19]  Robert C. G. Martin,et al.  Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[20]  P. Breslau,et al.  Recording and classification of complications in a surgical practice. , 1999, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[21]  R H Brook,et al.  Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. , 1995, JAMA.

[22]  J. Sanabria,et al.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. , 1992, Surgery.

[23]  D. Dindo.  The Clavien–Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications , 2014 .

[24]  A. Hoznek,et al.  Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. , 2013, Urologic oncology.

[25]  Daniel J. Bertges,et al.  Toward optimal recording of surgical complications: concurrent tracking compared to the discharge data set. , 2007, Surgery.

[26]  J Mollison,et al.  The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. , 2001, Health technology assessment.