Suitability of Machine Learning for Atrophy and Fibrosis Development in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Anti-VEGF therapy has reduced the risk of legal blindness on neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but still several patients develop fibrosis or atrophy in the long-term. Although recent statistical analyses have associated genetic, clinical and imaging biomarkers with the prognosis of patients with nAMD, no studies on the suitability of machine learning (ML) techniques have been conducted. We perform an extensive analysis on the use of ML to predict fibrosis and atrophy development on nAMD patients at 36 months from start of anti-VEGF treatment, using only data from the first 12 months. We use data collected according to real-world practice, which includes clinical and genetic factors. The ML analysis consistently found ETDRS to be relevant for the prediction of atrophy and fibrosis, confirming previous statistical analyses, while genetic variables did not show statistical relevance. The analysis also reveals that predicting one macular degeneration is a complex task given the available data, obtaining in the best case a balance accuracy of 63% and an AUC of 0.72. The lessons learnt during the development of this work can guide future ML-based prediction tasks within the ophthalmology field and help design the data collection process.

[1]  J. Araiz,et al.  The role of retinal fluid location in atrophy and fibrosis evolution of patients with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration long‐term treated in real world , 2021, Acta ophthalmologica.

[2]  L. Arias Barquet,et al.  Role of intraretinal and subretinal fluid on clinical and anatomical outcomes in patients with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration treated with bimonthly, treat‐and‐extend and as‐needed ranibizumab in the In‐Eye study , 2021, Acta ophthalmologica.

[3]  Kai Jin,et al.  Prediction of response to anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in diabetic macular oedema using an optical coherence tomography‐based machine learning method , 2020, Acta ophthalmologica.

[4]  S. Sadda,et al.  Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Use and Atrophy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Systematic Literature Review and Expert Opinion. , 2019, Ophthalmology.

[5]  David J. Wilson,et al.  Consensus Nomenclature for Reporting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Data: Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature Study Group. , 2019, Ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Guymer,et al.  Tolerating Subretinal Fluid in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated with Ranibizumab Using a Treat-and-Extend Regimen: FLUID Study 24-Month Results. , 2019, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Catherine Egan,et al.  Feasibility of support vector machine learning in age‐related macular degeneration using small sample yielding sparse optical coherence tomography data , 2019, Acta ophthalmologica.

[8]  Chang-Hao Yang,et al.  Biomarkers of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the treatment outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a real-world study , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[9]  T. Hong,et al.  The burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a patient’s perspective , 2018, Clinical ophthalmology.

[10]  Aaron Y. Lee,et al.  Real-world outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors , 2018, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[11]  R. Adelman,et al.  Age‐related macular degeneration: using morphological predictors to modify current treatment protocols , 2018, Acta ophthalmologica.

[12]  G. Ying,et al.  Baseline Predictors for Five-Year Visual Acuity Outcomes in the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials. , 2017, Ophthalmology. Retina.

[13]  Ivana K. Kim,et al.  Genetics of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). , 2017, Human molecular genetics.

[14]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[15]  Takkar Brijesh,et al.  Macular Atrophy Progression and 7-Year Vision Outcomes in Subjects From the ANCHOR, MARINA, and HORIZON Studies: The SEVEN-UP Study. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  U. Schmidt-Erfurth,et al.  A paradigm shift in imaging biomarkers in neovascular age-related macular degeneration , 2016, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[17]  D. Hinton,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of subretinal fibrosis in age-related macular degeneration. , 2016, Experimental eye research.

[18]  Wayne T. A. Enanoria,et al.  Macular atrophy progression and 7-year vision outcomes in subjects from the ANCHOR, MARINA, and HORIZON studies: the SEVEN-UP study. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  A. García-Layana,et al.  Growth of geographic atrophy on fundus autofluorescence and polymorphisms of CFH, CFB, C3, FHR1-3, and ARMS2 in age-related macular degeneration. , 2014, JAMA ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Groll,et al.  Age Macular Degeneration: Etiology, Prevention, Individualized Therapies, Cell Therapy, and Tissue Engineering , 2014, Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  R. González-Sarmiento,et al.  Predictive value of VEGF A and VEGFR2 polymorphisms in the response to intravitreal ranibizumab treatment for wet AMD , 2014, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[22]  Usha Chakravarthy,et al.  Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[23]  S. Rodríguez de Córdoba,et al.  Relevance of complement factor H-related 1 (CFHR1) genotypes in age-related macular degeneration. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  M. Brantley,et al.  Association of complement factor H and LOC387715 genotypes with response of exudative age-related macular degeneration to intravitreal bevacizumab. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[25]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Support vector machine , 2013 .

[26]  J. Nowak,et al.  Age-related macular degeneration (AMD): pathogenesis and therapy. , 2006, Pharmacological reports : PR.

[27]  Richard Simon,et al.  Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[28]  Andrew Y. Ng,et al.  Preventing "Overfitting" of Cross-Validation Data , 1997, ICML.