Habitat vulnerability in conservation planning—when it matters and how much

Addressing the vulnerability of areas to habitat loss remains a challenge for conservation planners. Different areas are often assumed equally vulnerable to habitat loss or, worse, conservation attention focuses on remote, unproductive areas contributing little to minimizing biodiversity loss. Understanding vulnerability is crucial to planning but gathering the required information can be time consuming and expensive; and any data on vulnerability will be uncertain. We investigated the circumstances in which including vulnerability data produces better conservation decisions. We found that it is best to use existing information on vulnerability only when uncertainty is less than 20%–30%. With higher uncertainty and large spatial variance in vulnerability, it is best to improve vulnerability data before making conservation decisions. Otherwise, it is best to ignore vulnerability and consider only biodiversity value. Other important factors are whether reservation displaces or inhibits habitat loss and the correlation between biodiversity value and vulnerability.

[1]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Accounting for habitat loss rates in sequential reserve selection : Simple methods for large problems , 2007 .

[2]  Bo Jellesmark Thorsen,et al.  Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world , 2006 .

[3]  M. Drechsler.  Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection , 2005 .

[4]  James N Sanchirico,et al.  Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Delaying conservation actions for improved knowledge: how long should we wait? , 2009, Ecology letters.

[6]  H. Possingham,et al.  The need for speed: informed land acquisitions for conservation in a dynamic property market. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[7]  Peter Berck,et al.  Habitat and Open Space at Risk of Land‐Use Conversion: Targeting Strategies for Land Conservation , 2006 .

[8]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[9]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world , 2004 .

[10]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[11]  S. Polasky,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection , 2004 .

[12]  Robert L Pressey,et al.  Measuring and Incorporating Vulnerability into Conservation Planning , 2005, Environmental management.

[13]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Effectiveness of protected areas in north-eastern New South Wales: recent trends in six measures , 2002 .

[14]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Two paths to a suboptimal solution – once more about optimality in reserve selection , 2008 .

[15]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  How well protected are the forests of north-eastern New South Wales? − Analyses of forest environments in relation to formal protection measures, land tenure, and vulnerability to clearing , 1996 .

[16]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Assessing replacement cost of conservation areas: how does habitat loss influence priorities? , 2009 .

[17]  Eve McDonald-Madden,et al.  Is conservation triage just smart decision making? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  Stephanie A. Snyder,et al.  A Scenario Optimization Model for Dynamic Reserve Site Selection , 2004 .

[19]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[20]  H. Possingham,et al.  Incorporating the Effects of Socioeconomic Uncertainty into Priority Setting for Conservation Investment , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[21]  Robert M Ewers,et al.  Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Paul G. Spirakis,et al.  Weighted random sampling with a reservoir , 2006, Inf. Process. Lett..

[23]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Reserve Acquisition Programs in Protecting Rare and Threatened Species , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts , 2006, Nature.

[25]  S. Polasky,et al.  Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  H. Possingham,et al.  Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  David A. Newburn,et al.  Economics and Land‐Use Change in Prioritizing Private Land Conservation , 2005 .

[28]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Accounting for habitat dynamics in conservation planning , 2009 .

[29]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  CONSERVATION PLANNING WITH DYNAMIC THREATS: THE ROLE OF SPATIAL DESIGN AND PRIORITY SETTING FOR SPECIES PERSISTENCE , 2010 .

[30]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss , 2001 .

[31]  R. Sabbadin,et al.  Pre-emptive conservation versus "fire-fighting": A decision theoretic approach , 2007 .