Interference from filled delays on visual change detection.

Failure to detect changes to salient visual input across a brief interval has popularized the use of change detection, a paradigm that plays important roles in recent studies of visual perception, short-term memory, and consciousness. Much research has focused on the nature of visual representation for the pre- and postchange displays, yet little is known about how visual change detection is interfered with by events inserted between the pre- and postchange displays. To address this question, we tested change detection of colors, spatial locations, and natural scenes, when the interval between changes was (1) blank, (2) filled with a visual scene, or (3) filled with an auditory word. Participants were asked to either ignore the filled visual or auditory event or attend to it by categorizing it as animate or inanimate. Results showed that the ability to detect visual changes was dramatically impaired by attending to a secondary task during the delay. This interference was significant for auditory as well as for visual interfering events and was invariant to the complexity of the prechange displays. Passive listening produced no interference, whereas passive viewing produced small but significant interference. We conclude that visual change detection relies significantly on central, amodal attention.

[1]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  When visual transients impair tactile change detection: A novel case of crossmodal change blindness? , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[3]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[4]  R. Logie.  Visuo-spatial Working Memory , 1994 .

[5]  D. Levin,et al.  Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[6]  W. Donaldson,et al.  Accuracy of d′ and A′ as estimates of sensitivity , 1993 .

[7]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Visual working memory for briefly presented scenes. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[8]  Bonnie L. Angelone,et al.  Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[9]  M. Wright.  Saliency predicts change detection in pictures of natural scenes. , 2005, Spatial vision.

[10]  C. Heywood,et al.  Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: the special role of object onset. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness in a working memory task. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  L. Standing.  Learning 10000 pictures , 1973 .

[15]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[16]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Working memory and interference: A comment on Jenkins, Myerson, Hale, and Fry (1999) , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  W. A. Phillips.  On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[19]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[20]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli , 2005 .

[21]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Attenuated Change Blindness for Exogenously Attended Items in a Flicker Paradigm , 2000 .

[22]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  R. Schweickert,et al.  Separable effects of factors on speed and accuracy: memory scanning, lexical decision, and choice tasks. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Robert H. Wurtz,et al.  Subcortical Modulation of Attention Counters Change Blindness , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  James T Enns,et al.  Change detection in an attended face depends on the expectation of the observer. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[26]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[27]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[28]  R. Marois,et al.  Distinct Capacity Limits for Attention and Working Memory , 2006, Psychological science.

[29]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[30]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Ronald A. Rensink.  Visual Search for Change: A Probe into the Nature of Attentional Processing , 2000 .

[32]  L. Standing.  Learning 10,000 pictures. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness , 2003, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Attentional bias affects change detection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  D. Ballard,et al.  What you see is what you need. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[41]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Interference in Immediate Spatial Memory: Shifts of Spatial Attention or Central executive Involvement? , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.