Assessment of the non‐hydrostatic effect on the upper atmosphere using a general circulation model (GCM)

[1] Under hydrostatic equilibrium, a typical assumption used in global thermosphere ionosphere models, the pressure gradient in the vertical direction is exactly balanced by the gravity force. Using the non-hydrostatic Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model (GITM), which solves the complete vertical momentum equation, the primary characteristics of non-hydrostatic effects on the upper atmosphere are investigated. Our results show that after a sudden intense enhancement of high-latitude Joule heating, the vertical pressure gradient force can locally be 25% larger than the gravity force, resulting in a significant disturbance away from hydrostatic equilibrium. This disturbance is transported from the lower altitude source region to high altitudes through an acoustic wave, which has beensimulated inaglobal circulation model forthefirst time. Due to the conservation of perturbation energy, the magnitude of the vertical wind perturbation increases with altitude andreaches 150(250) m/sat300(430) kmduringthe disturbance. The upward neutral wind lifts the atmosphere and raises the neutral density at high altitudes by more than 100%. These large vertical winds are not typically reproduced by hydrostatic models of the thermosphere and ionosphere. Our results give an explanation of the cause of such strong vertical winds reported in many observations. Citation: Deng, Y., A. D. Richmond, A. J. Ridley, and H.-L. Liu (2008), Assessment of the non-hydrostatic effect on the upper atmosphere using a general circulation model (GCM), Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01104, doi:10.1029/2007GL032182.

[1]  S. E. Pryse,et al.  First direct evidence of meso-scale variability on ion-neutral dynamics using co-located tristatic FPIs and EISCAT radar in Northern Scandinavia , 2005 .

[2]  Gábor Tóth,et al.  The Global Ionosphere-Thermosphere Model , 2006 .

[3]  C. Hines,et al.  Discussion of Ionization Effects on the Propagation of Acoustic‐Gravity Waves in The Ionosphere , 1970 .

[4]  G. Hernández,et al.  Vertical winds in the thermosphere within the polar cap , 1995 .

[5]  G. Hernández,et al.  Simultaneous measurements of large vertical winds in the upper and lower thermosphere , 1995 .

[6]  Yue Deng,et al.  Possible reasons for underestimating Joule heating in global models: E field variability, spatial resolution, and vertical velocity , 2007 .

[7]  Raymond G. Roble,et al.  A three‐dimensional general circulation model of the thermosphere , 1981 .

[8]  M. Conde,et al.  Characterization of acoustic–gravity waves in the upper thermosphere using Dynamics Explorer 2 Wind and Temperature Spectrometer (WATS) and Neutral Atmosphere Composition Spectrometer (NACS) data , 2002 .

[9]  William C. Skamarock,et al.  A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  T. Fuller‐Rowell,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Time-Dependent Global Model of the Thermosphere , 1980 .

[11]  R. Pfeffer,et al.  Acoustic-Gravity Wave Propagation from Nuclear Explosions in the Earth's Atmosphere , 1962 .