Deployments of the table-non-table: A Reflection on the Relation Between Theory and Things in the Practice of Design Research

Design-oriented research in HCI has increasingly migrated towards theoretical perspectives to understand the implications of newly crafted technology in everyday life. However, in this context, the relations between theory and understanding the things we make are not always clear, especially the degree to which the nature of research artifacts is revealed through or determined by theory. We examine a series of field deployment studies we conducted with our research artifact table-non-table over the course of four and a half years that we came to see as a postphenomenological inquiry. Importantly, our interpretations of this artifact, methodological concerns, and theoretical groundings evolved over time. We account for and critically reflect on these shifts in the relationship between theory and our design artifact. We detail how theory was enacted and embodied in our design research practice and offer insights into the complex relations between theory and things in design-oriented HCI research.

[1]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[2]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[3]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  D. Ihde.  Technology and the lifeworld : from garden to earth , 1991 .

[5]  D. Ihde.  Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context , 1993 .

[6]  Don Ihde.  Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction , 1998 .

[7]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[8]  Barton C. Massey,et al.  DESIGN METHODS , 2002 .

[9]  T. Schatzki.  The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change , 2002 .

[10]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[11]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[12]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Design-oriented human-computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[13]  Davis Baird,et al.  Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments , 2004 .

[14]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  The drift table: designing for ludic engagement , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[15]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward , 2004, DIS '04.

[16]  P. Verbeek.  What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[17]  Ben Matthews,et al.  Easy doesn’t do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Evan Selinger,et al.  Postphenomenology: A Critical Companion to Ihde , 2006 .

[19]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[20]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  The resourcefulness of everyday design , 2007, C&C '07.

[21]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[22]  P. Verbeek.  Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis , 2008 .

[23]  Judith Hills,et al.  The semantic turn: A new foundation for design , 2008 .

[24]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  Anatomy of a failure: how we knew when our design went wrong, and what we learned from it , 2009, CHI.

[25]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  The sudden experience of the computer , 2009, AI & SOCIETY.

[26]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be , 2009, CHI.

[27]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design , 2009, CHI.

[28]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Architectures of interaction: an architectural perspective on digital experience , 2010, NordiCHI.

[29]  John Zimmerman,et al.  An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[30]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Concept-Driven Interaction Design Research , 2010, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Eric Paulos,et al.  A phenomenology of human-electricity relations , 2011, CHI.

[32]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience , 2011, Design Issues.

[33]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Understanding repair as a creative process of everyday design , 2011, C&C '11.

[34]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Rudiments 1, 2 & 3: design speculations on autonomy , 2010, TEI.

[35]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction , 2011, CHI.

[36]  Peter-Paul Verbeek,et al.  Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things , 2011 .

[37]  John Bowers,et al.  The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of 'research through design' , 2012, DIS '12.

[38]  Kirk M. Besmer,et al.  Embodying a Translation Technology: The Cochlear Implant and Cyborg Intentionality , 2012 .

[39]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  Embodied technology and the dangers of using the phone while driving , 2012 .

[40]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[41]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research , 2012, TCHI.

[42]  William W. Gaver.  What should we expect from research through design? , 2012, CHI.

[43]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Indoor weather stations: investigating a ludic approach to environmental HCI through batch prototyping , 2013, CHI.

[44]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge , 2013, INTR.

[45]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  A sustainable design fiction , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[46]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation: a long term field study of the photobox , 2014, CHI.

[47]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Intersecting with Unaware Objects , 2015, Creativity & Cognition.

[48]  P. Verbeek.  COVER STORYBeyond interaction , 2015 .

[49]  P. Verbeek.  COVER STORY: Beyond interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory , 2015, Interactions.

[50]  Henry Lin,et al.  Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry , 2015, Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.

[51]  Carl Magnus Olsson,et al.  Beyond a utility view of personal informatics: a postphenomenological framework , 2015, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[52]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations , 2015 .

[53]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  A field guide to postphenomenology , 2015 .

[54]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Making Multiple Uses of the Obscura 1C Digital Camera: Reflecting on the Design, Production, Packaging and Distribution of a Counterfunctional Device , 2015, CHI.

[55]  Richard Banks,et al.  From Research Prototype to Research Product , 2016, CHI.

[56]  Simone Wannemaker.  The Things That Matter , 2016 .

[57]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Unselfconscious Interaction: A Conceptual Construct , 2016, Interact. Comput..

[58]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Videos of Things: Speculating on, Anticipating and Synthesizing Technological Mediations , 2017, CHI.

[59]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Morse Things: A Design Inquiry into the Gap Between Things and Us , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.