Paradoxes of Preferential Voting

What can go wrong with sophisticated voting systems designed to remedy problems of simpler systems.

[1]  A. Sen,et al.  Collective Choice and Social Welfare , 2017 .

[2]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Monotonicity paradoxes in the theory of elections , 1982, Discret. Appl. Math..

[3]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  The AMS Nomination Procedure Is Vulnerable to ‘Truncation of Preferences’ , 1982 .

[4]  Gideon Doron,et al.  He Hare Voting System is Inconsistent , 1979 .

[5]  H. Young,et al.  A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle , 1978 .

[6]  J. Kelly.  Arrow Impossibility Theorems , 1978 .

[7]  Gideon Doron,et al.  Single Transferrable Vote: An Example of a Perverse Social Choice Function , 1977 .

[8]  R. Niemi,et al.  The Choice of Voting Systems , 1976 .

[9]  H. Young.  Social Choice Scoring Functions , 1975 .

[10]  M. Satterthwaite.  Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions , 1975 .

[11]  P. Fishburn.  Paradoxes of Voting , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[12]  J. H. Smith.  AGGREGATION OF PREFERENCES WITH VARIABLE ELECTORATE , 1973 .

[13]  A. Gibbard.  Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result , 1973 .

[14]  P. Fishburn.  The Theory Of Social Choice , 1973 .

[15]  Alfred De Grazia,et al.  Mathematical Derivation of an Election System , 1953 .

[16]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[17]  Nils Herlitz.  Proportional Representation in Sweden , 1925, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Jerry S. Kelly,et al.  SIMPLICITY: IMPOSSIBILITY THEOREMS , 1978 .

[19]  Bhaskar Dutta,et al.  Strategy and group choice , 1978 .

[20]  Great Britain. Foreign Office..  Report of the royal commission appointed to enquire into electoral systems with appendices , 1910 .