A genetic analysis of senescence in Drosophila

TWO attractive theories for the evolution of senescence are based on the principle that the force of natural selection decreases with age1–5. The theories differ in the type of age-specific gene action that they assume. Antagonistic pleiotropy2–5 postulates that pleiotropic genes with positive effects early in life and negative effects of comparable magnitude late in life are favoured by selection, whereas genes with the reverse pattern of action are selected against. Mutation accumulation1,3–5 assumes that deleterious mutant alleles with age-specific effects will equilibrate at a lower frequency if their effects are expressed early rather than late in life. Explicit models demonstrate that both mechanisms can lead to the evolution of senescent life histories under reasonable conditions3–5. Antagonistic pleiotropy has gained considerable empirical support4–6, but the evidence in support of mutation accumulation is more sparse4,5,7. Here we report that the genetic variability of mortality in male Drosophila melanogaster increases greatly at very late ages, as predicted by the mutation accumulation hypothesis3–5. The rate of increase in mortality with age exhibits substantial genetic and environmental variability. This result provides a possible explanation for recent observations of non-increasing mortality rates in very old flies8,9.

[1]  D. Lindsley,et al.  The Genome of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1992 .

[2]  J. W. Bradbury Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives , 1987 .

[3]  L. Partridge,et al.  Optimally, mutation and the evolution of ageing , 1993, Nature.

[4]  J. Vaupel,et al.  Demography of genotypes: failure of the limited life-span paradigm in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1992, Science.

[5]  M. Pike,et al.  Slow mortality rate accelerations during aging in some animals approximate that of humans. , 1990, Science.

[6]  B. Charlesworth OPTIMIZATION MODELS, QUANTITATIVE GENETICS, AND MUTATION , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetic variation in recombination in Drosophila. I. Responses to selection and preliminary genetic analysis , 1985, Heredity.

[8]  D. Houle Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. , 1992, Genetics.

[9]  Caleb E. Finch,et al.  Longevity, senescence, and the genome , 1990 .

[10]  M. Rose ARTIFICIAL SELECTION ON A FITNESS‐COMPONENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  S. R. Searle A Biometrics Invited Paper. Topics in Variance Component Estimation , 1971 .

[12]  S. Wright Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 3: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions , 1977 .

[13]  S. R. Searle Generalized Inverse Matrices , 1971 .

[14]  H. Hartley Expectations, variances and covariances of anova mean squares by 'synthesis'. , 1967, Biometrics.

[15]  P. Medawar UNSOLVED problem of biology. , 1953, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  Brian Charlesworth,et al.  Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. , 1983 .

[17]  George C. Williams,et al.  PLEIOTROPY, NATURAL SELECTION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SENESCENCE , 1957, Science of Aging Knowledge Environment.

[18]  Thomas E. Johnson,et al.  Evolutionary biology of aging , 1990 .

[19]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females. , 1981, Genetics.

[20]  J. Vaupel,et al.  Slowing of mortality rates at older ages in large medfly cohorts. , 1992, Science.

[21]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[22]  L. Partridge,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY EFFECTS OF SELECTION ON AGE AT REPRODUCTION IN LARVAL AND ADULT: DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  J. Crow,et al.  The genetic variance for viability and its components in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1974, Genetics.