Feedforward Control Algorithms for MEMS Galvos and Scanners

Optical systems typically use galvanometers (galvos) and scanners. Galvos move, quasi-statically, from one static position to another. Scanners move in an oscillatory fashion, typically at the device resonant frequency. MEMS devices, which have many advantages and are often used in optical systems, are typically high Q devices. Moving from one position to another for a galvo or one amplitude to another for scanners, can take many periods to settle following the ring down. During these transitions, the optical system is inactive. Here, we show how precisely timed pulses can be used (in an open loop manner) to begin or end scanner motion without ring up/ring down time. The size of pulse required is found to depend on the Q of the device, and relationships are derived. The pulse can also be separated into multiple pulse spaced one period apart if pulses of the necessary size are not possible due to constraints of the physical device. For finite Q scanners, the amplitude decreases after the initial pulse due to damping. This can be eliminated by applying an excitation at the frequency of the scanner. The necessary amplitude for this excitation is derived. Finally, by combining this open loop control algorithm with an open loop control algorithm for galvo motion the device can seamlessly move between scanner and galvo functioning. These control algorithms are demonstrated using computer simulations, analytical models and a commercially available MEMS mirror (Mirrorcle Technologies, A8L2.2). [2020-0238]

[1]  H. Urey,et al.  MEMS Laser Scanners: A Review , 2014, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[2]  Josh Javor,et al.  Engineered PWM Drives for Achieving Rapid Step and Settle Times for MEMS Actuation , 2018, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[3]  Thomas G. Bifano,et al.  PWM as a Low Cost Method for the Analog Control of MEMS Devices , 2019, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[4]  Matthias Imboden,et al.  Atomic calligraphy: the direct writing of nanoscale structures using a microelectromechanical system. , 2013, Nano letters.

[5]  Huikai Xie,et al.  Modelling and Experimental Verification of Step Response Overshoot Removal in Electrothermally-Actuated MEMS Mirrors , 2017, Micromachines.

[6]  B. Jiang,et al.  Analysis of Frequency Drift of Silicon MEMS Resonator with Temperature , 2020, Micromachines.

[7]  Alexander Graham,et al.  Introduction to Control Theory, Including Optimal Control , 1980 .

[8]  D. Bishop,et al.  A Large Range of Motion 3D MEMS Scanner With Five Degrees of Freedom , 2019, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[9]  Martin L. Culpepper,et al.  Design of a six-axis micro-scale nanopositioner—μHexFlex , 2006 .

[10]  Huikai Xie,et al.  MEMS Mirrors for LiDAR: A Review , 2020, Micromachines.

[11]  Georg Schitter,et al.  MEMS-based lidar for autonomous driving , 2018, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[12]  Corey Pollock,et al.  High-Speed Control of Electromechanical Transduction: Advanced Drive Techniques for Optimized Step-and-Settle Response of MEMS Micromirrors , 2016, IEEE Control Systems.

[13]  D J Bishop,et al.  Extreme angle, tip-tilt MEMS micromirror enabling full hemispheric, quasi-static optical coverage. , 2019, Optics express.

[14]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Open-loop versus closed-loop control of MEMS devices: choices and issues , 2005 .

[15]  V. Dubey,et al.  MEMS Technology: A Review , 2019, Journal of Engineering Research and Reports.

[16]  Tian Jian Lu,et al.  Institute of Physics Publishing Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering Mems Actuators and Sensors: Observations on Their Performance and Selection for Purpose , 2022 .

[17]  Yuanping Song,et al.  A High-Speed Large-Range Tip-Tilt-Piston Micromirror Array , 2017, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.