The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Can Approximate Mental Calculation Account for Operational Momentum in Addition and Subtraction?

The operational momentum (OM) effect describes a cognitive bias whereby we overestimate the results of mental addition problems while underestimating for subtraction. To test whether the OM emerges from psychophysical characteristics of the mental magnitude representation we measured two basic parameters (Weber fraction and numerical estimation accuracy) characterizing the mental magnitude representation and participants’ performance in cross-notational addition and subtraction problems. Although participants were able to solve the cross-notational problems, they consistently chose relatively larger results in addition problems than in subtraction problems, thus replicating and extending previous results. Combining the above measures in a psychophysical model allowed us to partially predict the chosen results. Most crucially, however, we were not able to fully model the OM bias on the basis of these psychophysical parameters. Our results speak against the idea that the OM is due to basic characteristics of the mental magnitude representation. In turn, this might be interpreted as evidence for the assumption that the OM effect is better explained by attentional shifts along the mental magnitude representation during mental calculation.

[1]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[4]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[5]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[7]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[8]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[9]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic , 2006 .

[10]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Neglect Impairs Explicit Processing of the Mental Number Line , 2022 .

[11]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in mosquitofish , 2009, Cognition.

[12]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[13]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[14]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[15]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[16]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Jacky Emmerton,et al.  Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons , 2006, Learning & behavior.

[18]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Compressed Scaling of Abstract Numerosity Representations in Adult Humans and Monkeys , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Supramodal numerosity selectivity of neurons in primate prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Calibrating the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  E. Miller,et al.  Coding of Cognitive Magnitude Compressed Scaling of Numerical Information in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[22]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Steffen Zitzmann,et al.  Examining the Presence and Determinants of Operational Momentum in Childhood , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[24]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[25]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic , 2008, Cognition.

[26]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Individual differences in non-symbolic numerical abilities predict mathematical achievements but contradict ATOM , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[27]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[28]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Spatial Intuition in Elementary Arithmetic: A Neurocomputational Account , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  The mental number line: exact and approximate , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  E. Spelke,et al.  Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[34]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Training the Approximate Number System Improves Math Proficiency , 2013, Psychological science.

[35]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[36]  Wim Gevers,et al.  Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Reading space into numbers – a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect , 2008, Cognition.

[38]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Large Number Discrimination by Mosquitofish , 2010, PloS one.

[39]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[41]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Emergence of a 'visual number sense' in hierarchical generative models , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling , 2010, Cognition.