Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth

Objective: Glass carbomer cement represents a new generation of dental material, which mineralizes gradually into fluorapatite. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage and marginal integrity of newly developed glass carbomer cement with and without protective surface coating (SC) in primary molars. Methods: Standardized cavities were prepared on extracted human primary molars, and the teeth were randomly assigned into the following groups (n = 10/each): (1) conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) without SC; (2) GIC with SC; (3) glass carbomer cement without SC; (4) glass carbomer cement with SC; and (5) compomer without SC. Following thermocycling (5 ± 2°C–55 ± 2°C, dwell time 15 s, 2000×), the specimens were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution, sectioned, and digitally photographed. Microleakage was evaluated quantitatively by using open-source image analysis toolkit (ImageJ), and the data were analyzed statistically by using Kruskal-Wallis and Conover’s Multiple Comparison tests (P=.05). Results: The greatest amount of dye leakage was observed in the uncoated glass carbomer specimens, followed by the uncoated glass ionomer group (P<.05). There was no significant difference between the microleakage values of coated glass ionomer, coated glass carbomer, and the compomer (P>.05). The following statistical ranking was observed among microleakage of the test materials: uncoated glass carbomer > uncoated glass ionomer > coated glass ionomer ≈ coated glass carbomer ≈ compomer. Uncoated glass carbomer exhibited severe internal ice crack-like lines. Conclusion: The use of the new glass carbomer cement without SC results in severe microleakage and catastrophic internal cracks.

[1]  J. Frencken,et al.  Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  I. Mjör,et al.  The longevity of different restorations in primary teeth. , 2010, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[3]  J. Hebling,et al.  CYTOTOXICITY AND BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT PULP CAPPING MATERIALS , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[4]  T. Ardenghi,et al.  Clinical performance of ART restorations in primary teeth: a survival analysis. , 2009, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[5]  Z. Cehreli,et al.  Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after four-year water storage in vitro. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[6]  E. Davidovich,et al.  Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  N. Kotsanos,et al.  The early fluoride release pattern of an aged glass ionomer treated with fluoride. , 2007, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[8]  R. Hickel,et al.  Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.

[9]  M. Tyas,et al.  Adhesive restorative materials: a review. , 2004, Australian dental journal.

[10]  C. Davidson,et al.  In situ transformation of glass-ionomer into an enamel-like material. , 2004, American journal of dentistry.

[11]  V. Qvist,et al.  Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  V. Qvist,et al.  Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer. , 2004, European journal of oral sciences.

[13]  W. D’hoore,et al.  Influence of the number of sections on reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[14]  Moss ME Aligne CA Conservative Dental Surgery: Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. , 2003, British Dental Journal.

[15]  K. Söderholm,et al.  Microleakage and wall adaptation of conservative restorations. , 2002, American journal of dentistry.

[16]  M. Tyas,et al.  Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. , 2002, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[17]  K. Donly,et al.  Enamel de/remineralization on teeth adjacent to fluoride releasing materials without dentifrice exposure. , 1999, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[18]  R. Rc,et al.  Influence of protecting agents on the solubility of glass ionomers. , 1995 .

[19]  A. A. Del Bel Cury,et al.  Influence of protecting agents on the solubility of glass ionomers. , 1995, American journal of dentistry.

[20]  R. Erickson,et al.  Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. , 1994, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[21]  T. Watson,et al.  Effectiveness of glass-ionomer surface protection treatments: a scanning optical microscope study. , 1993, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[22]  S. Twetman,et al.  Caries associated microflora in plaque from orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[23]  H. Hirukawa,et al.  Effect of coating materials on restorative glass-ionomer cement surface. , 1992, Operative dentistry.

[24]  Smith Dc Polyacrylic acid-based cements: adhesion to enamel and dentin. , 1992 .

[25]  D. Smith Polyacrylic acid-based cements: adhesion to enamel and dentin. , 1992, Operative dentistry.

[26]  Equipment,et al.  Using Glass Ionomers , 1990 .

[27]  Using glass ionomers. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. , 1990, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[28]  C. Davidson,et al.  The relevance of controlled fluoride release with bonded orthodontic appliances. , 1987, Journal of dentistry.

[29]  G. Mount,et al.  Effect of varnishes and other surface treatments on water movement across the glass-ionomer cement surface. , 1985, Australian dental journal.

[30]  E. Asmussen Opacity of glass-ionomer cements. , 1983, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[31]  Makinson Of,et al.  Glass-ionomer restorative cements: clinical implications of the setting reaction. , 1982 .

[32]  G. Mount,et al.  Glass-ionomer restorative cements: clinical implications of the setting reaction. , 1982, Operative dentistry.