Stimulated Recall as a Trigger for Increasing Noticing and Language Awareness in the L2 Writing Classroom: A Case Study of Two Young Female Writers

Appropriately timed Focus on Form can help in raising the learners' language awareness. In this paper we argue that the learner's own text composition progression can indicate when a learner is ready to notice a particular language form. Stimulated recall induced discussion was used to provoke explicit writer comments relating to noticing and language awareness. Two female Swedish 13-year-olds wrote descriptive texts in English using the computer key-stroke logging program, JEdit. This program registers each key-stroke and its time of occurrence. JEdit includes a replay facility. Half of the writing sessions were directly followed by a stimulated recall session in which the writers used the software to comment upon a text's composition progression. A teacher took part in the discussion and gave Focus on Form elaboration when required. Later, the students were invited back to revise their texts. In the analysis we have coupled the comments from the first writing occasion with the changes made. We have also analysed the number of words written and revisions undertaken in each text's composition progression. The results show that the stimulated recall sessions were awareness raising and that they induced the writers to revise more, as an influence of the discussion.

[1]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects , 2001 .

[2]  S. Gass,et al.  Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research , 2000 .

[3]  R. Ellis DOES FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION AFFECT THE ACQUISITION OF IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE? , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[4]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[5]  R. Sheen A Critical Analysis of the Advocacy of the Task‐Based Syllabus , 1994 .

[6]  D. Laplane Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[7]  M. Swain Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[8]  A. Fortune,et al.  Knotted and Entangled: New Light on the Identification, Classification and Value of Language Related Episodes in Collaborative Output Tasks , 2001 .

[9]  Seán Devitt,et al.  Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory , 2000 .

[10]  Kerstin Severinson Eklundh,et al.  Emerging discourse structure : computer-assisted episode analysis as a window to global revision in university students' writing , 2003 .

[11]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  Collaborative Writing in L2: The Effect of Group Interaction on Text Quality , 2002 .

[12]  R. Schmidt The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[13]  Huub van den Bergh,et al.  Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes , 1996 .

[14]  Ernesto Macaro,et al.  Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms , 2001 .

[15]  Stephen Krashen,et al.  The Effect of Formal Grammar Teaching: Still Peripheral , 1993 .

[16]  Michael H. Long On the Advocacy of the Task‐Based Syllabus , 1994 .