Post Offering Earnings Performance of Firms that Issue Seasoned Equity: The Role of Growth Opportunities

This study finds that growth firms experience significant unanticipated deterioration in their earnings performance following their seasoned equity offerings (SEO), but mature firms do not share the same negative experience. This finding is consistent with the findings of long run post offering stock price underperformance documented in the literature. However, it is inconsistent with the findings of a weak positive impact of growth opportunities on the stock price reaction to the SEO announcement. The negative role of growth opportunities also contradicts the predictions of signaling models that growth potential of the issuing firm has a positive impact on the information content of the SEO. Overall, the findings in this study are consistent with the general implication of the overvaluation hypothesis that managers issue equity securities when they know their firm is not as valuable as what the market believes.

[1]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Managerial Performance, Tobin's Q, and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers , 1989 .

[2]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[3]  P. Brous.  Common Stock Offerings and Earnings Expectations: A Test of the Release of Unfavorable Information , 1992 .

[4]  D. Emery,et al.  Firm Performance And Security Type In Seasoned Offerings: An Empirical Examination Of Alternative Signaling Models , 1993 .

[5]  W. Hopwood,et al.  A multivariate analysis of annual earnings forecasts generated from quarterly forecasts of financial , 1980 .

[6]  Joseph T. Williams,et al.  Efficient Signalling with Dividends and Investments , 1987 .

[7]  R. Litzenberger,et al.  Announcement effects of new equity issues and the use of intraday price data , 1988 .

[8]  Scott E. Stickel.  The effect of value line investment survey rank changes on common stock prices , 1985 .

[9]  R. Hansen,et al.  Corporate Earnings and Financings: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  L. Brown,et al.  The Superiority of Analyst Forecasts as Measures of Expectations: Evidence from Earnings , 1978 .

[11]  Eugene A. Pilotte.  Growth Opportunities and the Stock Price Response to New Financing , 1992 .

[12]  David J. Denis.  Investment Opportunities and the Market Reaction to Equity Offerings , 1994, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[13]  Prem C. Jain.  Equity Issues and Changes in Expectations of Earnings by Financial Analysts , 1992 .

[14]  E. Lindenberg,et al.  Tobin's q Ratio and Industrial Organization , 1981 .

[15]  Larry H. P. Lang,et al.  Dividend announcements: Cash flow signalling vs. free cash flow hypothesis? , 1989 .

[16]  Clifford W. Smith.  INVESTMENT BANKING AND THE CAPITAL ACQUISITION PROCESS , 1986 .

[17]  Tim Loughran,et al.  The New Issues Puzzle , 1995 .

[18]  David Mayers,et al.  The value line enigma (1965-1978) : A case study of performance evaluation issues , 1982 .

[19]  A. R. Ofer,et al.  Convertible call policies: An empirical analysis of an information-signaling hypothesis☆ , 1987 .

[20]  D. Spiess,et al.  Underperformance in long-run stock returns following seasoned equity offerings , 1995 .

[21]  A. Kalay,et al.  Positive information from equity issue announcements , 1993 .

[22]  D. Siegel,et al.  The information content of equity-for-debt swaps : An investigation of analyst forecasts of firm cash flows , 1989 .

[23]  Merton H. Miller,et al.  Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information , 1985 .