Using scalp electrical biosignals to control an object by concentration and relaxation tasks: Design and evaluation

In this paper we explore the use of electrical biosignals measured on scalp and corresponding to mental relaxation and concentration tasks in order to control an object in a video game. To evaluate the requirements of such a system in terms of sensors and signal processing we compare two designs. The first one uses only one scalp electroencephalographic (EEG) electrode and the power in the alpha frequency band. The second one uses sixteen scalp EEG electrodes and machine-learning methods. The role of muscular activity is also evaluated using five electrodes positioned on the face and the neck. Results show that the first design enabled 70% of the participants to successfully control the game, whereas 100% of the participants managed to do it with the second design based on machine learning. Subjective questionnaires confirm these results: users globally felt to have control in both designs, with an increased feeling of control in the second one. Offline analysis of face and neck muscle activity shows that this activity could also be used to distinguish between relaxation and concentration tasks. Results suggest that the combination of muscular and brain activity could improve performance of this kind of system. They also suggest that muscular activity has probably been recorded by EEG electrodes.

[1]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  The Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Non-Medical Uses of BCI Technology , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[2]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[3]  Sara Ilstedt Hjelm,et al.  Brainball - using brain activity for cool competition , 2000 .

[4]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfacing and Games , 2010, Brain-Computer Interfaces.

[6]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces, Virtual Reality, and Videogames , 2008, Computer.

[8]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Douglas Heingartner.  Mental block , 2009, IEEE Spectrum.

[10]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  OpenViBE: An Open-Source Software Platform to Design, Test, and Use BrainComputer Interfaces in Real and Virtual Environments , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[11]  L. R. John,et al.  Quantifying Mental Relaxation with EEG for use in Computer Games , 2006, International Conference on Internet Computing.

[12]  Keng Peng Tee,et al.  Learning EEG-based spectral-spatial patterns for attention level measurement , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[13]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  The Hybrid BCI , 2010, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[14]  Wolfgang Klimesch,et al.  Individual differences in brain dynamics: important implications for the calculation of event-related band power , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  F. Apollonio.  33rd Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference , 2011 .

[16]  A. Pope,et al.  Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task , 1995, Biological Psychology.