Net change in carbon emissions with increased wood energy use in the United States

Use of wood biomass for energy results in carbon (C) emissions at the time of burning and alters C stocks on the land because of harvest, regrowth, and changes in land use or management. This study evaluates the potential effects of expanded woody biomass energy use (for heat and power) on net C emissions over time. A scenario with increased wood energy use is compared with a dynamic business‐as‐usual scenario where wood energy use is driven by its historical relationship with gross domestic product. At the national level, we projected that up to 78% of increased cumulative C emissions from increased wood burning and up to 80% of increased cumulative radiative forcing would be offset over 50 years by change in forest area loss, biomass regrowth on land, C storage in harvested wood products, and C in logging slash left in forests. For example, forest area is projected to decline in both scenarios, but 3.5 million hectares more are retained in the high wood energy‐use case. Projected C offsets over a 50 year period differed substantially by US region (16% in the North, 50% in the West, and 95% in the South) not only because of differences in forest regrowth and induced investment in retaining and planting forest, but also because of shifts in competitive advantage among regions in producing various wood products. If wood systems displace coal systems that have 75% of the C emissions of wood energy systems per unit energy, then the nationwide net C emissions offset would be reduced to 71–74%. If displacing natural gas systems that have 40% of the level of wood bioenergy emissions per unit energy, the nationwide net C emissions offset would be 46–52%.

[1]  A Technical Document Supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment A Technical Document Supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment , 2000 .

[2]  David N. Wear,et al.  Forecasts of forest conditions in regions of the United States under future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2012 RPA Assessment. , 2013 .

[3]  L. Sokka,et al.  Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment – a review , 2013 .

[4]  Jesse D. Henderson,et al.  Effect of policy-based bioenergy demand on southern timber markets: A case study of North Carolina , 2010 .

[5]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  International Demand Equations for Forest Products: A Comparison of Methods , 2001 .

[6]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Economic approach to assess the forest carbon implications of biomass energy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[8]  J. Coulston,et al.  Forecasts of forest conditions , 2013 .

[9]  David N. Wear,et al.  Forecasts of county-level land uses under three future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment , 2011 .

[10]  Lew R. McCreery,et al.  Wood Energy in America , 2009, Science.

[11]  Kenneth E. Skog,et al.  Projection of U.S. forest sector carbon sequestration under U.S. and global timber market and wood energy consumption scenarios, 2010-2060. , 2012 .

[12]  J. Melillo,et al.  Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? , 2009, Science.

[13]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[14]  N. Bird,et al.  Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel , 2012 .

[15]  Karen L. Abt,et al.  Effect of Bioenergy Demands and Supply Response on Markets, Carbon, and Land Use , 2012 .

[16]  Xiaohui Tian,et al.  Does wood bioenergy increase carbon stocks in forests , 2012 .

[17]  Christopher S. Galik,et al.  Forest biomass supply in the southeastern United States - implications for industrial roundwood and bioenergy production. , 2009 .

[18]  DYNAMICS OF COARSE WOODY DEBRIS IN NORTH AMERICAN FORESTS: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2004 .

[19]  Kenneth E. Skog,et al.  Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States , 2008 .

[20]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[21]  S. Ohrel,et al.  Accounting framework for biogenic CO2 emissions from stationary sources , 2011 .

[22]  J. Penman,et al.  Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories CH 4 Emissions from Solid Waste Disposal 419 CH 4 EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL , 2022 .

[23]  Greg Latta,et al.  Biomass production from the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard , 2013 .

[24]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2015 .

[25]  Kenneth E. Skog,et al.  U.S. forest products module : a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment , 2011 .

[26]  Claudia A. Sagastizábal,et al.  Divide to conquer: decomposition methods for energy optimization , 2012, Mathematical Programming.

[27]  Giuntoli Jacopo,et al.  Carbon accounting of forest bioenergy : Conclusions and recommendations from a critical literature review , 2014 .

[28]  J. Spitzer,et al.  CARBON BALANCE OF BIOENERGY FROM LOGGING RESIDUES , 1995 .

[29]  Nathan D. Richardson,et al.  FOREST CARBON ECONOMICS: WHAT WE KNOW, WHAT WE DO NOT AND WHETHER IT MATTERS , 2012 .

[30]  Charles Smith,et al.  Co-benefits of utilizing logging residues for bioenergy production: the case for East Texas, USA. , 2007 .

[31]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Forests for Carbon Sequestration or Fossil Fuel Substitution? A Sensitivity Analysis , 1997 .

[32]  P. Ince,et al.  Modeling future U.S. forest sector market and trade impacts of expansion in wood energy consumption , 2011 .