Nonlinear Inversion for Multiple Objects in Transient Electromagnetic Induction Sensing of Unexploded Ordnance: Technique and Applications

We develop an inversion technique to process overlapping data that arise from closely spaced targets. In contrast to a usual single-object inversion model, a multiobject problem is more challenging because of the increased number of parameters to be found and because of the additional nonlinearity and nonuniqueness. Our solution strategy is to break down the full problem into a sequence of smaller problems so that optimization is conducted in a lower dimensional model space. In the numerical implementation, a set of nonlinear model parameters, e.g., the locations of the underlying sources, is sought while the set of linear model parameters, i.e., their polarization tensors, are updated accordingly in a nested manner. This is an explicit separable nonlinear optimization technique that we cast. We employ a joint diagonalization to find an average principal direction among multiple magnetic polarizability tensors. Since the principal directions are more sensitive to the inaccuracies in the estimated polarization tensor, we suggest a subsequent procedure to optimize the two sets of parameters: orientation and principal polarizations of objects. For initialization, we propose a selected multistart nonlinear algorithm for source localizations that paves an efficient way to find a good initial guess of model parameters and makes the nonlinear inversion effectively automated. We report the new applications of the technique to the test-stand and field data acquired with next-generation sensor systems of the TEMTADS and MetalMapper and study the issue of the spatial resolution of overlapping anomalies through inversions and using the metric defined as the total uncertainty of the polarizabilities.

[1]  Douglas Oldenburg,et al.  Selecting a Discrimination Algorithm for Unexploded Ordnance Remediation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Detection of Unexploded Ordnance via Efficient Semisupervised and Active Learning , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  T. Bell Adaptive and Iterative Processing Techniques for Overlapping Signatures , 2006 .

[4]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Computing Transient Electromagnetic Responses of a Metallic Object Using a Spheroidal Excitation Approach , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[5]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Independent component analysis, A new concept? , 1994, Signal Process..

[6]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Statistical classification of buried objects from spatially sampled time or frequency domain electromagnetic induction data , 2004 .

[7]  Lotfollah Shafai,et al.  Near-zone fields scattered by three-dimensional highly conducting permeable objects in the field of an arbitrary loop , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Benjamin Barrowes,et al.  Detection of multiple subsurface metallic targets using EMI data , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  S. K. Runcorn,et al.  Interpretation theory in applied geophysics , 1965 .

[10]  J. T. Smith,et al.  Resolution depths for some transmitter-receiver configurations , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Sensing of unexploded ordnance with magnetometer and induction data: theory and signal processing , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[13]  Lloyd S. Riggs,et al.  Identification of metallic mine-like objects using low frequency magnetic fields , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Spheroidal Mode Approach for the Characterization of Metallic Objects Using Electromagnetic Induction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Antoine Souloumiac,et al.  Jacobi Angles for Simultaneous Diagonalization , 1996, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[16]  J. P. Fernández,et al.  Application of the normalized surface magnetic charge model to UXO discrimination in cases with overlapping signals , 2007 .

[17]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[18]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Transient electromagnetic inversion for multiple targets , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Electromagnetic Induction From Highly Permeable and Conductive Ellipsoids Under Arbitrary Excitation: Application to the Detection of Unexploded Ordnances , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Statistical Classification of Buried Unexploded Ordnance Using Nonparametric Prior Models , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Support Vector Machine and Neural Network Classification of Metallic Objects Using Coefficients of the Spheroidal MQS Response Modes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Dean Keiswetter,et al.  EMI Array for Cued UXO Discrimination , 2008 .

[24]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Classification of closely spaced subsurface objects using electromagnetic induction data and blind source separation algorithms , 2004 .

[25]  Bruce Barrow,et al.  Model-based characterization of electromagnetic induction signatures obtained with the MTADS electromagnetic array , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[26]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Simple phenomenological models for wideband frequency-domain electromagnetic induction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Subsurface Sensing Under Sensor Positional Uncertainty , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  M. Brereton Classical Electrodynamics (2nd edn) , 1976 .

[29]  Y. Das,et al.  Analysis of an electromagnetic induction detector for real-time location of buried objects , 1990 .

[30]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Fast and accurate calculation of physically complete EMI response by a heterogeneous metallic object , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Application of the theory of optimal experiments to adaptive electromagnetic-induction sensing of buried targets , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[32]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for subsurface target detection and identification using time-domain electromagnetic induction data , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  M. Wax,et al.  A least-squares approach to joint diagonalization , 1997, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[34]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  An Interior Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds , 1993, SIAM J. Optim..

[35]  Carl E. Baum,et al.  On the low-frequency natural response of conducting and permeable targets , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[37]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  A Discrimination Algorithm for UXO Using Time Domain Electromagnetics , 2001 .

[38]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  The Levenberg-Marquardt algo-rithm: Implementation and theory , 1977 .

[39]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Classification of Unexploded Ordnance Using Incomplete Multisensor Multiresolution Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[40]  I. J. Won,et al.  Characterization of UXO-like targets using broadband electromagnetic induction sensors , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[41]  Robert H. Halstead,et al.  Matrix Computations , 2011, Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing.

[42]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Subsurface discrimination using electromagnetic induction sensors , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[43]  L. Pasion Inversion of time domain electromagnetic data for the detection of Unexploded Ordnance , 2007 .

[44]  Scott C. MacInnes,et al.  An Assessment of Three Dipole-based Programs For Estimating UXO Target Parameters With Induction EM , 2008 .

[45]  Yacine Dalichaouch,et al.  On the wideband EMI response of a rotationally symmetric permeable and conducting target , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..