Crossflow microfiltration of microalgae biomass for biofuel production.

Abstract Crossflow microfiltration (MF) was successfully implemented for harvesting microalgae suspensions from a culture medium. In this study, investigations were carried out to harvest Chlorella sp. using a cellulose acetate (CA) membrane. Electrophoretic mobility profile during the cultivation process showed a maximum electronegative value of − 2.56 ± 0.07 μmcm/Vs on the 9th day of the experiment which were taken as a fresh cultures in each cultivation process. The effects of hydrodynamic conditions on the permeation flux are also discussed. The results show that the permeate flux increases with an increasing crossflow velocity (CFV) and transmembrane pressure (TMP). The flux is higher when the pressure is high, suggesting that the resistance of the membranes to mass transfer increases; hence, the applied pressure (driving force) has to be increased to obtain a higher flux. Furthermore, an increase in the CFV leads to a higher shear velocity, which makes it more difficult for microalgae to be deposited on the membrane, thus giving a better flux. The analysis of various resistances encountered in membrane filtration which involves the resistance of membrane itself and cake as well as those due to pore blocking and concentration polarization was studied. The experimental results obtained here show that the cake resistance (Rc) played a more major role in the filtration rate than the resistance due to concentration polarization (Rcp) and pore blocking (Rb) under the conditions examined. An increase in the CFV and a decrease in the TMP result in a reduction in the cake layer formation.

[1]  A. Ahmad,et al.  Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: A review , 2011 .

[2]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Renewable fuels from algae: an answer to debatable land based fuels. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[3]  G. J. Alaerts,et al.  Tangential flow filtration: A method to concentrate freshwater algae , 1995 .

[4]  Siegfried Ripperger,et al.  Crossflow microfiltration – state of the art , 2002 .

[5]  Y. Chisti Biodiesel from microalgae. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[6]  Michael K. Danquah,et al.  Microalgal growth characteristics and subsequent influence on dewatering efficiency , 2009 .

[7]  A. Converti,et al.  EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND NITROGEN CONCENTRATION ON THE GROWTH AND LIPID CONTENT OF NANNOCHLOROPSIS OCULATA AND CHLORELLA VULGARIS FOR BIODIESEL PRODUCTION , 2009 .

[8]  Arief Widjaja,et al.  Study of increasing lipid production from fresh water microalgae Chlorella vulgaris , 2009 .

[9]  Wei-Ming Lu,et al.  Cross-flow microfiltration of submicron microbial suspension , 2001 .

[10]  S. Takizawa,et al.  Microfiltration membrane fouling and cake behavior during algal filtration , 2010 .

[11]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  Modeling of pore blocking and cake layer formation in membrane filtration for wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[12]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Influence of cross-flow velocity on membrane performance during filtration of biological suspension , 2005 .

[13]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  Determining the zeta-potential of ceramic microfiltration membranes using the electroviscous effect , 1998 .

[14]  P Jaouen,et al.  Arthrospira platensis harvesting with membranes: fouling phenomenon with limiting and critical flux. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[15]  N. Xu,et al.  Crossflow filtration of nanosized catalysts suspension using ceramic membranes , 2011 .

[16]  M. Tekić,et al.  Membrane fouling during cross-flow microfiltration of Polyporus squamosus fermentation broth , 2001 .

[17]  N. Dizge,et al.  Influence of type and pore size of membranes on cross flow microfiltration of biological suspension , 2011 .

[18]  J. Teixeira,et al.  Influence of cell-shape on the cake resistance in dead-end and cross-flow filtrations , 2002 .

[19]  P. Jaouen,et al.  The role of exopolysaccharides in fouling phenomenon during ultrafiltration of microalgae (Chlorella sp. and Porphyridium purpureum): Advantage of a swirling decaying flow , 2002, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[20]  T. Moritz,et al.  Influence of the surface charge on the permeate flux in the dead-end filtration with ceramic membranes , 2001 .

[21]  S. Mondal,et al.  A fouling model for steady state crossflow membrane filtration considering sequential intermediate pore blocking and cake formation , 2010 .

[22]  Naoko Ellis,et al.  Perspectives on biodiesel as a sustainable fuel , 2010 .

[23]  A. Ahmad,et al.  Optimization of microalgae coagulation process using chitosan , 2011 .

[24]  Teresa M. Mata,et al.  Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review , 2010 .

[25]  K. Tran,et al.  Towards Sustainable Production of Biofuels from Microalgae , 2008, International journal of molecular sciences.

[26]  J. Murphy,et al.  Mechanism and challenges in commercialisation of algal biofuels. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[27]  M. Morrissey,et al.  Fouling of membranes during microfiltration of surimi wash water: Roles of pore blocking and surface cake formation , 1998 .

[28]  S. Takizawa,et al.  Chemical pretreatment for reduction of membrane fouling caused by algae , 2011 .

[29]  Fatemeh Rekabdar,et al.  Ceramic membrane performance in microfiltration of oily wastewater , 2011 .

[30]  Q. Hu,et al.  Harvesting algal biomass for biofuels using ultrafiltration membranes. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[31]  M. Benjamin,et al.  A serial filtration investigation of membrane fouling by natural organic matter , 2007 .

[32]  R. Juang,et al.  Resistance-in-series analysis in cross-flow ultrafiltration of fermentation broths of Bacillus subtilis culture , 2008 .

[33]  Y. Chisti,et al.  Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics. , 2003, Biotechnology advances.