The Competitive Characteristics of U.S Manufacturers in the Machine Tool Industry

This paper examines the competitive characteristics of U.S. manufacturers in the machine tool (MT) industry. After several decades of decline, this industry has recently shown signs of a modest but sustained recovery. Empirical evidence from a national survey of 104 MT producers suggests that the revival of this sector has been driven by a combination of factors, including renewed export involvement, improved customer support, and better product design. Although most MT companies are small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), the survey data show that very small SMEs are poorly represented in the recovery thrust of the industry as a whole. Our principal conclusion is that the MT industry has been following an export-led path toward stabilization, but that certain types of small producers are unlikely to thrive for very long. The most serious problems facing small producers include shrinking local markets, import competition, shortages of skilled labor, and cyclical demand.

[1]  Anthony DiFilippo.  Military Spending and Industrial Decline: A Study of the American Machine Tool Industry , 1986 .

[2]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[3]  R. Thurik,et al.  Some New Evidence on the Determinants of Large- and Small-Firm Innovation , 1997 .

[4]  P. O'farrell,et al.  The Regional Extent of Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) Machine Tool Adoption and Post Adoption Success in Small British Mechanical Engineering Firms , 1992 .

[5]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Does Entry Size Matter? The Impact of the Life Cycle and Technology on Firm Survival , 2001 .

[6]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[7]  Steven R. Nivin.  Regional Innovation Potential: The Case of the U.S. Machine Tool Industry , 2000 .

[8]  Megan K. Blake,et al.  A Survey of Group Technology Adoption in the American Midwest , 1994 .

[9]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  On the Relationship Between Firm Size and Export Intensity , 1992 .

[10]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Manufacturing strategy, business strategy and firm performance in a mature industry , 1995 .

[11]  B. Carlsson,et al.  Flexible technology and industrial structure in the U.S. , 1994 .

[12]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation and Size at the Firm Level , 1991 .

[13]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation and firm size in manufacturing , 1988 .

[14]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  The Decline of the U.S. Machine-Tool Industry and Prospects for Its Sustainable Recovery , 1995 .

[15]  Robert Forrant.  Good Jobs and the Cutting Edge: The U.S. Machine Tool Industry and Sustainable Prosperity , 1997 .

[16]  B. Harrison,et al.  Innovative Firm Behavior and Local Milieu: Exploring the Intersection of Agglomeration, Firm Effects, and Technological Change , 1996 .

[17]  Frederick V. Geier.  The Machine Tool Industry , 1950 .

[18]  R. P. Oakey,et al.  Regional Variations in the Adoption of Computer-Numerically-Controlled Machine Tools by Small Engineering Firms: A Multivariate Analysis , 1992 .

[19]  M. Dertouzos,et al.  Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge , 1989 .

[20]  J. Calof.  The Relationship Between Firm Size and Export Behavior Revisited , 1994 .

[21]  Z. Ács,et al.  Flexible technology and plant size U.S. manufacturing and metalworking industries , 1994 .

[22]  M. Gertler.  Worlds apart: The changing market geography of the German machinery industry , 1996 .