Spatial integration of band-pass filtered patterns in noise

Contrast energy thresholds were measured for noisy band-pass filtered Sloan letters, K, H, O, and a plus symbol (+) at various centre frequencies and bandwidths. For all patterns the efficiency and energy sensitivity of detection increased with filter bandwidth but decreased with increasing filter centre frequency. Hence, neither parameter alone can explain the changes in efficiency and energy sensitivity. Irrespective of centre frequency and bandwidth, efficiency and energy sensitivity were found to decrease as a single power function of image complexity (Z) defined as the product of the square of the median spatial frequency (fm) of the image energy spectrum and image area (A95) comprising 95% of total contrast energy of the stimulus. The product Z = fm2A95 describes image complexity in the sense that when f2m or A95 increase the number of details increase, too. The decrease of the efficiency of detection with increasing image complexity suggests that the proportion of the integrated image area decreases as the complexity of an image increases.

[1]  W N Charman,et al.  A simple parametric model of the human ocular modulation transfer function , 1991, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[2]  A. E. Burgess,et al.  Vision: High level visual decision efficiencies , 1991 .

[3]  F A Bilsen,et al.  The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. , 1974, Vision research.

[4]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[6]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Pattern recognition, attention, and information bottlenecks in the primate visual system , 1991, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  R. Hess,et al.  The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[10]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Vision: The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception , 1990 .

[11]  D. Pelli,et al.  The information capacity of visual attention , 1992, Vision Research.

[12]  John F. Jarvis,et al.  A survey of techniques for the display of continuous tone pictures on bilevel displays , 1976 .

[13]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[14]  H. Barlow,et al.  The statistical efficiency for detecting sinusoidal modulation of average dot density in random figures , 1981, Vision Research.

[15]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[16]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  D. Kersten.  Spatial summation in visual noise , 1984, Vision Research.

[18]  J. McCann,et al.  Visibility of low-spatial-frequency sine-wave targets: Dependence on number of cycles. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.