Validity and Reproducibility of ICDAS II in Primary Teeth

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of the ICDAS II (International Caries Detection and Assessment System) criteria in primary teeth. Three trained examiners independently examined 112 extracted primary molars, ranging from clinically sound to cavitated, set up in groups of 4 to mimic their anatomical positions. The most advanced caries on the occlusal and approximal surfaces was recorded. Subsequently the teeth were serially sectioned and histological validation was undertaken using the Downer and Ekstrand-Ricketts-Kidd (ERK) scoring systems. For occlusal surfaces at the D1/ERK1 threshold, the mean specificity was 90.0%, with a sensitivity of 75.4%. For approximal surfaces, the specificity and sensitivity were 85.4 and 66.4%, respectively. For occlusal surfaces at ICDAS code ≥3 (ERK3 threshold), the mean specificity and sensitivity were 87.0 and 78.1%, respectively. For approximal surfaces, the equivalent values were 90.6 and 75.3%. At the D3 threshold for occlusal surfaces, the mean specificity and sensitivity were 92.8 and 63.1%, and for approximal surfaces 94.2 and 58.3%, respectively. Mean intraexaminer reproducibility (Cohen’s kappa) ranged from 0.78 to 0.81 at the ICDAS code ≥1 cut-off and at the ICDAS code ≥3 cut-off from 0.74 to 0.76. Interexaminer reproducibility was lower, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 at the ICDAS code ≥1 cut-off and from 0.66 to 0.73 at the ICDAS code ≥3 cut-off. In conclusion, the validity and reproducibility of the ICDAS II criteria were acceptable when applied to primary molar teeth.

[1]  E. Kidd,et al.  Relating visual and radiographic ranked scoring systems for occlusal caries detection to histological and microbiological evidence. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[2]  Downer Mc.  Validation of methods used in dental caries diagnosis. , 1989 .

[3]  E. Kidd,et al.  Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. , 1997, Caries research.

[4]  Marthaler Tm.  THE CARIES-INHIBITING EFFECT OF AMINE FLUORIDE DENTIFRICES IN CHILDREN DURING THREE YEARS OF UNSUPERVISED USE. , 1965 .

[5]  James D Bader,et al.  A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. , 2002, Journal of public health dentistry.

[6]  N B Pitts,et al.  The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. , 2007, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[7]  F. Mendes,et al.  Influence of examiner's clinical experience in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. , 2005, Pediatric dentistry.

[8]  N. Pitts,et al.  In vitro validity of the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM). , 2000, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[9]  A. Lussi,et al.  Performance of Conventional and New Methods for the Detection of Occlusal Caries in Deciduous Teeth , 2003, Caries Research.

[10]  O. Backer Dirks,et al.  A Reproducible Method for Caries Evaluation , 1951, Journal of dental research.

[11]  P. Ashley,et al.  Use of a ranked scoring system to detect occlusal caries in primary molars. , 2007, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[12]  M. Braga,et al.  Performance of a Pen-Type Laser Fluorescence Device and Conventional Methods in Detecting Approximal Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth – in vivo Study , 2009, Caries Research.

[13]  E. Kidd,et al.  Detection, Diagnosing, Monitoring and Logical Treatment of Occlusal Caries in Relation to Lesion Activity and Severity: An in vivo Examination with Histological Validation , 1998, Caries Research.

[14]  C. Deery,et al.  Prevalence of Dental Caries in Latvian 11– to 15–Year–Old Children and the Enhanced Diagnostic Yield of Temporary Tooth Separation, FOTI and Electronic Caries Measurement , 1999, Caries Research.

[15]  N. Pitts,et al.  The Effect of Varying Diagnostic Thresholds upon Clinical Caries Data for a Low Prevalence Group , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[16]  A. Ismail,et al.  Visual and Visuo-tactile Detection of Dental Caries , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[17]  M. Heinzel-Gutenbrunner,et al.  Reproducibility and Accuracy of the ICDAS-II for Detection of Occlusal Caries in vitro , 2008, Caries Research.

[18]  T. Ardenghi,et al.  In vivo Effectiveness of Laser Fluorescence Compared to Visual Inspection and Radiography for the Detection of Occlusal Caries in Primary Teeth , 2003, Caries Research.

[19]  D. Attrill,et al.  Diagnostics: Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods , 2001, British Dental Journal.

[20]  R. Holt,et al.  Visual and radiographic diagnosis of occlusal caries in first permanent molars and in second primary molars , 1993, British Dental Journal.

[21]  N. Pitts,et al.  An Abbreviated Caries Clinical Trial Design Validated over 24 Months , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[22]  F. Mendes,et al.  Use of high-powered magnification to detect occlusal caries in primary teeth. , 2006, American Journal of Dentistry.

[23]  M. Downer.  Concurrent validity of an epidemiological diagnostic system for caries with the histological appearance of extracted teeth as validating criterion. , 1975, Caries research.

[24]  P. Ashley,et al.  Diagnosis of occlusal caries in primary teeth. , 2008, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[25]  Nigel Pitts,et al.  "ICDAS"--an international system for caries detection and assessment being developed to facilitate caries epidemiology, research and appropriate clinical management. , 2004, Community dental health.