Effect of Interactions between Harvester Ants on Forager Decisions

Harvester ant colonies adjust their foraging activity to day-to-day changes in food availability and hour-to-hour changes in environmental conditions. This collective behavior is regulated through interactions, in the form of brief antennal contacts, between outgoing foragers and returning foragers with food. Here we consider how an ant, waiting in the entrance chamber just inside the nest entrance, uses its accumulated experience of interactions to decide whether to leave the nest to forage. Using videos of field observations, we tracked the interactions and foraging decisions of ants in the entrance chamber. Outgoing foragers tended to interact with returning foragers at higher rates than ants that returned to the deeper nest and did not forage. To provide a mechanistic framework for interpreting these results, we develop a decision model in which ants make decisions based upon a noisy accumulation of individual contacts with returning foragers. The model can reproduce core trends and realistic distributions for individual ant interaction statistics, and suggests possible mechanisms by which foraging activity may be regulated at an individual ant level.

[1]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[2]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective Decision-Making and Foraging Patterns in Ants and Honeybees , 2008 .

[3]  E. J. Tehovnik,et al.  Microstimulation of visual cortex to restore vision. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[4]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[5]  T. Seeley,et al.  Swarm cognition in honey bees , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  Thomas Schlegel,et al.  Stop Signals Provide Cross Inhibition in Collective Decision-making , 2022 .

[7]  Colin Torney,et al.  Context-dependent interaction leads to emergent search behavior in social aggregates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests , 1996 .

[9]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[10]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  Deborah M Gordon,et al.  How Patrollers Set Foraging Direction in Harvester Ants , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Adam Guetz,et al.  Colony variation in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ants. , 2011, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[13]  A. Crespi,et al.  Tracking Individuals Shows Spatial Fidelity Is a Key Regulator of Ant Social Organization , 2013, Science.

[14]  Roman Garnett,et al.  Multi-scale Inference of Interaction Rules in Animal Groups Using Bayesian Model Selection , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  Maya B. Mathur,et al.  Interactions Increase Forager Availability and Activity in Harvester Ants , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  I. Couzin.  Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[19]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The rewards of restraint in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ant colonies , 2013, Nature.

[20]  David Raposo,et al.  Dynamic weighting of multisensory stimuli shapes decision-making in rats and humans. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[21]  A. Pilko,et al.  Colony life history and lifetime reproductive success of red harvester ant colonies. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[22]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Forager activation and food availability in harvester ants , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  D M Gordon,et al.  The behavioral ecology of variation in social insects. , 2016, Current opinion in insect science.

[24]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Jean-Pierre Eckmann,et al.  Desert ants achieve reliable recruitment across noisy interactions , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[26]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Interactions with Combined Chemical Cues Inform Harvester Ant Foragers' Decisions to Leave the Nest in Search of Food , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[28]  Jochen Ditterich,et al.  Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: Behavior and physiology , 2006, Neural Networks.

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[30]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The short-term regulation of foraging in harvester ants , 2008 .

[31]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[33]  David Raposo,et al.  Multisensory Decision-Making in Rats and Humans , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Katherine N. Dektar,et al.  Harvester Ant Colony Variation in Foraging Activity and Response to Humidity , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Microstimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Deborah,et al.  The Relation of Recruitment Rate to Activity Rhythms in the Harvester Ant , Pogonomyrmex barbatus ( F . Smith ) ( Hymenoptera : Formicidae ) , 2008 .

[38]  D. Gordon.  The spatial scale of seed collection by harvester ants , 1993, Oecologia.

[39]  Alex Kacelnik,et al.  Darwin’s “tug-of-war” vs. starlings’ “horse-racing”: how adaptations for sequential encounters drive simultaneous choice , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The development of an ant colony's foraging range , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Of Rats and Humans , 2007 .

[42]  Bingni W. Brunton,et al.  Rats and Humans Can Optimally Accumulate Evidence for Decision-Making , 2013, Science.

[43]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The dynamics of the daily round of the harvester ant colony (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making. , 2010, Psychological review.

[46]  Philip Holmes,et al.  Optimality and Some of Its Discontents: Successes and Shortcomings of Existing Models for Binary Decisions , 2014, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[47]  Simon Stevens,et al.  Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: methylation is not involved in the regulation of MET expression , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[48]  D. Gordon.  The Regulation of Foraging Activity in Red Harvester Ant Colonies , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[49]  Alessandro Crespi,et al.  Social Organization Tracking Individuals Shows Spatial Fidelity Is a Key Regulator of Ant , 2013 .

[50]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[51]  N. Franks,et al.  A Mechanism for Value-Sensitive Decision-Making , 2013, PloS one.

[52]  Jochen Ditterich.  Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: behavior and physiology , 2006 .

[53]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[54]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Asymmetrical integration of sensory information during mating decisions in grasshoppers , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  M. Beekman,et al.  Information integration and multiattribute decision making in non-neuronal organisms , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Nest architecture and traffic flow: large potential effects from small structural features , 2010 .

[57]  Balaji Prabhakar,et al.  The Regulation of Ant Colony Foraging Activity without Spatial Information , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[58]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  James S. Waters,et al.  Information Processing in Social Insect Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[60]  Shamik Dasgupta,et al.  FoxP influences the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision in Drosophila , 2014, Science.

[61]  Martin C. Stumpe,et al.  Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  Serban Nacu,et al.  How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants , 2009 .

[63]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Recruitment pheromone in the harvester ant genus Pogonomyrmex. , 2001, Journal of insect physiology.

[64]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The effect of individual variation on the structure and function of interaction networks in harvester ants , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.