Measuring functional status of chronic coronary patients. Reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical change of the reduced version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI).

AIMS Health-related quality of life assessment may be useful for understanding the variability in functioning of patients with a similar level of clinical impairment. We assessed the reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical change of a reduced version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) in chronic coronary patients. METHODS AND RESULTS The reduced version of the DASI, a measure of self-reported functional capacity, was administered twice to two groups of patients: 46 stable coronary heart disease outpatients were tested and re-tested 2 weeks after their initial visit; and 44 patients undergoing elective angioplasty for angina pectoris were evaluated the day before and one month after the procedure. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) functional grade was assessed in all patients, and a treadmill exercise test was performed sequentially (before and after the procedure) in angioplasty patients. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients for reduced DASI scores were high (between 0.81 and 0.89). Correlations of the reduced DASI scores with CCS grade and exercise test duration were moderately high (r = -0.51 and r = 0.45, respectively). Improvement after angioplasty as assessed by the reduced DASI scores was important (effect size = 0.75, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The reduced DASI is reliable, valid and responsive to clinical changes. Health-related quality of life measures may be useful in monitoring coronary patients.

[1]  D. Mark,et al.  Better functional status in American than Canadian patients with heart disease: an effect of medical care? , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  I. Wilson,et al.  Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. , 1995, JAMA.

[3]  J. Spertus,et al.  Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  K. Lee,et al.  Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Gordon Guyatt,et al.  Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  C. Naylor,et al.  The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grading Scale for Angina Pectoris: Is It Time for Refinements? , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  R A Deyo,et al.  Strategies for improving and expanding the application of health status measures in clinical settings. A researcher-developer viewpoint. , 1992, Medical care.

[8]  M A Hlatky,et al.  Relation of clinical and angiographic factors to functional capacity as measured by the Duke Activity Status Index. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  R A Deyo,et al.  Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. , 1991, Controlled clinical trials.

[10]  J. Antó,et al.  Comparison of perceived health status and conventional functional evaluation in stable patients with coronary artery disease. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  L. Goldman,et al.  Patient characteristics in SUPPORT: activity status and cognitive function. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  M A Hlatky,et al.  A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  Lewis E. Kazis,et al.  Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.

[14]  R H Brook,et al.  Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. , 1987, JAMA.

[15]  B. O'brien,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of heart transplant programmes: quality of life data and their relationship to survival analysis. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[16]  G. Klerman,et al.  The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  C. Furberg,et al.  Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  L. Wilkins.  Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups. , 1983, Circulation.

[19]  E. Cook,et al.  Pitfalls in the serial assessment of cardiac functional status. How a reduction in "ordinary" activity may reduce the apparent degree of cardiac compromise and give a misleading impression of improvement. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.