Paths combination for HENs retrofit

Abstract With the significant increase in fuel price, energy conservation projects should be reviewed and analyzed properly. Retrofit of heat exchanger networks (HENs) is among the common projects to reduce the plant operational cost. This paper introduced a new procedure using the path analysis approach for HEN retrofit. The developed procedure attempts at generating options for retrofit solution. These options are created by combining the available utility paths in HEN systematically. Instead of relying on a single path, the heat load could be shifted from HEN utilities using a set of paths simultaneously. To ensure feasible heat transfer between the hot and cold streams throughout, Exchanger Minimum Approach Temperature (EMAT) is maintained while shifting the heat load. The available exchangers’ pressure drop is considered in calculating the heat transfer coefficients. HEN devices are subjected to some additional area without any topological modification. In addition, the investment of such area could be recovered in a short span of time. The calculation of this approach encountered some iteration which has been overcome by mathematical programming. Demonstration example showed some options to be reasonable retrofit solutions. Energy savings ranged between $150 K and $450 K per year with payback time of less than 2 years were possible.

[1]  Fernando L.P. Pessoa,et al.  Fluid dynamical considerations on heat exchanger networks , 2000 .

[2]  Louis Gosselin,et al.  Minimizing shell‐and‐tube heat exchanger cost with genetic algorithms and considering maintenance , 2007 .

[3]  Mogens Weel Hansen,et al.  Retrofit and optimisation of industrial heat exchanger networks: A complete benchmark problem , 1997 .

[4]  N.D.K. Asante,et al.  An Automated and Interactive Approach for Heat Exchanger Network Retrofit , 1997 .

[5]  B. Linnhoff,et al.  The pinch design method for heat exchanger networks , 1983 .

[6]  Andrzej Kraslawski,et al.  Study on the Methodology for Retrofitting Chemical Processes , 2000 .

[7]  Reşat Selbaş,et al.  A new design approach for shell-and-tube heat exchangers using genetic algorithms from economic point of view , 2006 .

[8]  Bodo Linnhoff,et al.  A User guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy , 1994 .

[9]  N.D.K. Asante,et al.  An automated approach for heat exchanger network retrofit featuring minimal topology modifications , 1996 .

[10]  Simon Perry,et al.  Heat integration retrofit analysis of a heat exchanger network of a fluid catalytic cracking plant , 2001 .

[11]  M. H. Panjeshahi,et al.  Pressure drop optimisation in debottlenecking of heat exchanger networks , 2008 .

[12]  Per-Åke Franck,et al.  Retrofit of heat exchanger networks , 1991 .

[13]  Petar Sabev Varbanov,et al.  Rules for paths construction for HENs debottlenecking , 2000 .

[14]  Peter J.T. Verheijen,et al.  The placement of two-stream and multi-stream heat-exchangers in an existing network through path analysis , 1995 .

[15]  Robin Smith,et al.  Chemical Process: Design and Integration , 2005 .

[16]  Earl William Swokowski,et al.  Precalculus: Functions and Graphs , 1987 .

[17]  Roger Josef Zemp,et al.  Retrofit of pressure drop constrained heat exchanger networks , 2000 .

[18]  Peter J.T. Verheijen,et al.  Structural targeting for heat integration retrofit , 1998 .