Advantage of Beam Angle Optimization in Head-and-Neck IMRT: Patient Specific Analysis

Radiation therapy (RT) main purpose is to eliminate, in a controlled way, all tumor cells sparing as much as possible the normal tissues. Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is becoming the standard treatment technique in RT. Beam angle optimization (BAO) has potential to confer more quality to IMRT inverse planning process compared to manual trial and error approaches. In this study, the BAO advantages in head-and-neck patients are highlighted, using a patient specific analysis. Fluence optimization was done with Erasmus-iCycle multicriterial engine and BAO optimization was performed using two different algorithms: a combinatorial iterative algorithm and an algorithm based on a pattern search method. Plan assessment and comparison was performed with the graphical tool SPIDERplan. Among a set of forty studied nasopharynx cancer cases, three patients have been select for the specific analysis presented in this work. BAO presented plan quality improvements when beam angular optimized plans were compared with the equidistant beam angle solution and when plans based on non-coplanar beams geometries were compared with coplanar arrangements. Improvement in plan quality with a reduced number of beams was also achieved, in one case. For all cases, BAO generated plans with higher target coverage and better sparing of the normal tissues.

[1]  D. Craft Local beam angle optimization with linear programming and gradient search , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Maria do Carmo Lopes,et al.  Simulated annealing applied to IMRT beam angle optimization: A computational study. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[3]  L B Marks,et al.  Selection of coplanar or noncoplanar beams using three-dimensional optimization based on maximum beam separation and minimized nontarget irradiation. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  K. Sheng,et al.  A novel optimization framework for VMAT with dynamic gantry couch rotation , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  B. Ferreira,et al.  SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment. , 2016, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[6]  Fernando Alonso,et al.  A new concept for interactive radiotherapy planning with multicriteria optimization: first clinical evaluation. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Ke Sheng,et al.  4π non-coplanar liver SBRT: a novel delivery technique. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Humberto Rocha,et al.  Beam angle optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a guided pattern search method , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  H. O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements , 1975 .

[10]  Tiago Ventura,et al.  A derivative-free multistart framework for an automated noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT. , 2016, Medical physics.

[11]  Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) , 2010 .

[12]  M. Ehrgott,et al.  Beam selection in radiotherapy design , 2008 .

[13]  Jan Unkelbach,et al.  Accelerated iterative beam angle selection in IMRT. , 2016, Medical physics.

[14]  Peter Ziegenhein,et al.  Comparison of beam angle selection strategies for intracranial IMRT. , 2012, Medical physics.

[15]  Ben J M Heijmen,et al.  iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.