Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities

[1]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Ethical Drug Discovery , 2015 .

[2]  Ahmet H. Kirca,et al.  Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2012 .

[3]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. , 2009 .

[4]  H. Ju,et al.  Competitive Strategy , 2012 .

[5]  L. Ngo,et al.  Creating superior customer value for B2B firms through supplier firm capabilities , 2012 .

[6]  Francisco J. Molina-Castillo,et al.  Product competence exploitation and exploration strategies: The impact on new product performance through quality and innovativeness , 2011 .

[7]  S. Hart,et al.  Roles, role performance, and radical innovation competences , 2011 .

[8]  Shih-Chieh Fang,et al.  Relationship learning and innovation: The role of relationship-specific memory , 2011 .

[9]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[10]  Giselle Rampersad,et al.  Managing innovation networks: Exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networks , 2010 .

[11]  R. Lee,et al.  Implications of service processes outsourcing on firm value , 2010 .

[12]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[13]  Jean L. Johnson,et al.  Managing Multiple Facets of Risk in New Product Alliances , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[14]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: The Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations , 2010 .

[15]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Open Versus Closed Innovation: A Model of Discovery and Divergence , 2010 .

[16]  Saurabh Mishra,et al.  Evaluating the Financial Impact of Branding Using Trademarks: A Framework and Empirical Evidence , 2009 .

[17]  Nukhet Harmancioglu.  Portfolio of controls in outsourcing relationships for global new product development , 2009 .

[18]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets , 2009 .

[19]  Helen N. Rothberg,et al.  Intellectual capital in business-to-business markets , 2009 .

[20]  Ho Gyun Kim.  On the Evolutionary Theory of the Firm , 2009 .

[21]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Brand Portfolio Strategy and Firm Performance , 2009 .

[22]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value , 2008 .

[23]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Understanding the antecedents of collateral learning in new product alliances , 2008 .

[24]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Important research questions in technology and innovation , 2008 .

[25]  K. Manfreda,et al.  Web Surveys versus other Survey Modes: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates , 2008 .

[26]  G. Duysters,et al.  Networking as a Means to Strategy Change: The Case of Open Innovation in Mobile Telephony , 2007 .

[27]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[28]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Working with Rivals: The Impact of Competitor Alliances on Financial Performance , 2007 .

[29]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Penguins, Camels, and Other Birds of a Feather: Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[30]  R. Gulati.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[31]  G. Tellis,et al.  Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science , 2006 .

[32]  S. Dutta,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in High-Technology Markets: The Competitive Advantage of the Haves , 2006 .

[33]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[34]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[35]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[36]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Innovacion disruptiva para el cambio social , 2006 .

[37]  Pengzhu Zhang,et al.  Developing relationships in strategic alliances: Commitment to quality and cooperative interdependence , 2005 .

[38]  G. George.  Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms , 2005 .

[39]  Songpol Kulviwat,et al.  Marketing, market growth, and endogenous growth theory: An inquiry into the causes of market growth , 2005 .

[40]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Strategic Responses to New Technologies and Their Impact on Firm Performance , 2004, Journal of Marketing.

[41]  C. Fornell,et al.  Customer Satisfaction and Shareholder Value , 2004 .

[42]  Sridhar Narayanan,et al.  Return on Investment Implications for Pharmaceutical Promotional Expenditures: The Role of Marketing-Mix Interactions , 2004 .

[43]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  The Role of Relational Knowledge Stores in Interfirm Partnering , 2004 .

[44]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[45]  S. Dutta,et al.  Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability , 2004 .

[46]  Mark Rogers,et al.  Network density and R&D spillovers , 2004 .

[47]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Patrick Waelbroeck,et al.  Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data , 2003 .

[49]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Jeannie L. Johnson,et al.  Market-focused strategic flexibility: Conceptual advances and an integrative model , 2003 .

[51]  R. Calantone,et al.  Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance , 2002 .

[52]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[53]  Ulrich Kaiser.  Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: an empirical assessment of alternative approaches , 2002 .

[54]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[55]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[56]  A. King,et al.  Competencies and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradox , 2001 .

[57]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[58]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process , 2000 .

[59]  Sandy D. Jap,et al.  Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment , 2000 .

[60]  Helen Perks,et al.  Marketing Information Exchange Mechanisms in Collaborative New Product Development: The Influence of Resource Balance and Competitiveness , 2000 .

[61]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[62]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  R&D spillovers and productivity: Evidence from U.S. manufacturing microdata , 2000 .

[63]  F. Dwyer,et al.  An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes , 2000 .

[64]  M. Porter.  What is strategy , 2000 .

[65]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[66]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development , 1999 .

[67]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[68]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[69]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[70]  Wilbur G. Lewellen,et al.  On the measurement of Tobin's q , 1997 .

[71]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[72]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER , REALLY ? , 1997 .

[73]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[74]  Henry Mintzberg.  Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[75]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[76]  David J. Miller,et al.  Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework , 1994 .

[77]  Stephen W. Pruitt,et al.  A Simple Approximation of Tobin's Q , 1994 .

[78]  James M. Sinkula.  Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[79]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences , 1993 .

[80]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[81]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[82]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries , 1988 .

[83]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[84]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1987 .

[85]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[86]  A. Hunter,et al.  The Interorganizational Network as a Resource: A Comparative Case Study on Organizational Genesis. , 1985 .

[87]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[88]  J. P. Peter.  Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices , 1981 .

[89]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[90]  L. Bourgeois.  On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[91]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[92]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[93]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[94]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .