Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer.

BACKGROUND Use of computed tomography (CT) for diagnostic evaluation has increased dramatically over the past 2 decades. Even though CT is associated with substantially higher radiation exposure than conventional radiography, typical doses are not known. We sought to estimate the radiation dose associated with common CT studies in clinical practice and quantify the potential cancer risk associated with these examinations. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study describing radiation dose associated with the 11 most common types of diagnostic CT studies performed on 1119 consecutive adult patients at 4 San Francisco Bay Area institutions in California between January 1 and May 30, 2008. We estimated lifetime attributable risks of cancer by study type from these measured doses. RESULTS Radiation doses varied significantly between the different types of CT studies. The overall median effective doses ranged from 2 millisieverts (mSv) for a routine head CT scan to 31 mSv for a multiphase abdomen and pelvis CT scan. Within each type of CT study, effective dose varied significantly within and across institutions, with a mean 13-fold variation between the highest and lowest dose for each study type. The estimated number of CT scans that will lead to the development of a cancer varied widely depending on the specific type of CT examination and the patient's age and sex. An estimated 1 in 270 women who underwent CT coronary angiography at age 40 years will develop cancer from that CT scan (1 in 600 men), compared with an estimated 1 in 8100 women who had a routine head CT scan at the same age (1 in 11 080 men). For 20-year-old patients, the risks were approximately doubled, and for 60-year-old patients, they were approximately 50% lower. CONCLUSION Radiation doses from commonly performed diagnostic CT examinations are higher and more variable than generally quoted, highlighting the need for greater standardization across institutions.

[1]  D A Pierce,et al.  Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2000, Radiation research.

[2]  H. Greess,et al.  Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions , 2000, European Radiology.

[3]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  D. Pierce,et al.  DOSE RESPONSE AND TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF RADIATION-ASSOCIATED SOLID CANCER RISKS , 2003, Health physics.

[5]  R. Doll,et al.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  G. Brix,et al.  [5 years of "concerted action dose reduction in CT" -- what has been achieved and what remains to be done?]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[7]  J. Blobel,et al.  5 Jahre Konzertierte Aktion Dosisreduktion CT - was wurde erreicht, was ist noch zu tun? , 2004 .

[8]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.

[9]  Full-body CT screening: preventing or producing cancer? , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[12]  J. Valentin,et al.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[13]  Michael J Pentecost,et al.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[14]  D. L. Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 , 2007, Radiation research.

[15]  Adrian K. Dixon,et al.  Benefits and costs, an eternal balance , 2007 .

[16]  Greta Toncheva,et al.  Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. , 2007, Radiology.

[17]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[18]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. , 2008, Radiology.

[20]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  MEDICAL RADIATION EXPOSURE IN THE U.S. IN 2006: PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 2008, Health physics.

[21]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. , 2008, Health affairs.

[22]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Variability in radiation dose estimates from nuclear and computed tomography diagnostic imaging , 2008 .

[23]  William H. Judy,et al.  The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT , 2008 .

[24]  Javier Sanz,et al.  Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in 16-slice computed tomography coronary angiography , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[25]  Preetha Rajaraman,et al.  Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations , 2009, Pediatric Radiology.

[26]  Kelly H Zou,et al.  Routine pelvic and lower extremity CT venography in patients undergoing pulmonary CT angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  D. Broga,et al.  Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States , 2009 .

[28]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. , 2009, Radiology.

[30]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.

[31]  Matthew J Schipper,et al.  Medical decision making regarding computed tomographic radiation dose and associated risk: the patient's perspective. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.