Coordinating directional switches in pigeon flocks: the role of nonlinear interactions

The mechanisms inducing unpredictably directional switches in collective and moving biological entities are largely unclear. Deeply understanding such mechanisms is beneficial to delicate design of biologically inspired devices with particular functions. Here, articulating a framework that integrates data-driven, analytical and numerical methods, we investigate the underlying mechanism governing the coordinated rotational flight of pigeon flocks with unpredictably directional switches. Particularly using the sparse Bayesian learning method, we extract the inter-agent interactional dynamics from the high-resolution GPS data of three pigeon flocks, which reveals that the decision-making process in rotational switching flight performs in a more nonlinear manner than in smooth coordinated flight. To elaborate the principle of this nonlinearity of interactions, we establish a data-driven particle model with two potential wells and estimate the mean switching time of rotational direction. Our model with its analytical and numerical results renders the directional switches of moving biological groups more interpretable and predictable. Actually, an appropriate combination of natures, including high density, stronger nonlinearity in interactions, and moderate strength of noise, can enhance such highly ordered, less frequent switches.

[1]  Xianbin Cao,et al.  Predictability of real temporal networks , 2020, National science review.

[2]  Hugh Chen,et al.  From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees , 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[3]  A. Puglisi,et al.  Spontaneous Velocity Alignment in Motility-Induced Phase Separation. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[4]  G. Ariel,et al.  A phase diagram for bacterial swarming , 2019, Communications Physics.

[5]  Alex Thornton,et al.  Behavioural plasticity and the transition to order in jackdaw flocks , 2019, Nature Communications.

[6]  Richard T. Vaughan,et al.  Collective turns in jackdaw flocks: kinematics and information transfer , 2019, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Melissa R. McGuirl,et al.  Topological data analysis of zebrafish patterns , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Alex Thornton,et al.  Costs and benefits of social relationships in the collective motion of bird flocks , 2019, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[9]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  A model of collective behavior based purely on vision , 2019, Science Advances.

[10]  V. Guttal,et al.  Noise-induced schooling of fish , 2019, Nature Physics.

[11]  Karen C. Abbott,et al.  Transient phenomena in ecology , 2018, Science.

[12]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  From local collective behavior to global migratory patterns in white storks , 2018, Science.

[13]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Topology Identification and Learning over Graphs: Accounting for Nonlinearities and Dynamics , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  G. Sugihara,et al.  Fluctuating interaction network and time-varying stability of a natural fish community , 2018, Nature.

[15]  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Effects of Heterogeneous Social Interactions on Flocking Dynamics. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[16]  Marc Timme,et al.  Model-free inference of direct network interactions from nonlinear collective dynamics , 2017, Nature Communications.

[17]  Hai-Tao Zhang,et al.  Intermittence and connectivity of interactions in pigeon flock flights , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Duxin Chen,et al.  Anisotropic interaction rules in circular motions of pigeon flocks: An empirical study based on sparse Bayesian learning. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[19]  James B. Brown,et al.  Iterative random forests to discover predictive and stable high-order interactions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Lucas Barberis,et al.  Large-Scale Patterns in a Minimal Cognitive Flocking Model: Incidental Leaders, Nematic Patterns, and Aggregates. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[21]  Zhiyong Chen,et al.  Pattern phase transitions of self-propelled particles: gases, crystals, liquids, and mills , 2016 .

[22]  Seung‐Yeal Ha,et al.  Synchronization of Kuramoto Oscillators with Adaptive Couplings , 2016, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[23]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Local equilibrium in bird flocks , 2015, Nature Physics.

[24]  Dora Biro,et al.  Modelling group navigation: transitive social structures improve navigational performance , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  Wei Lin,et al.  Time delay can facilitate coherence in self-driven interacting-particle systems. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Ying Cheng Lai,et al.  Controlling complex, non-linear dynamical networks , 2014 .

[27]  Guy-Bart Stan,et al.  A Sparse Bayesian Approach to the Identification of Nonlinear State-Space Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[28]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Flocking and Turning: a New Model for Self-organized Collective Motion , 2014, ArXiv.

[29]  Eliseo Ferrante,et al.  Elasticity-based mechanism for the collective motion of self-propelled particles with springlike interactions: a model system for natural and artificial swarms. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[30]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Interaction rules underlying group decisions in homing pigeons , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[31]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Context-dependent hierarchies in pigeons , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Louise Dyson,et al.  Noise-induced bistable states and their mean switching time in foraging colonies. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[33]  Andrea Cavagna,et al.  Superfluid transport of information in turning flocks of starlings , 2013, 1303.7097.

[34]  Andrea Perna,et al.  The modelling cycle for collective animal behaviour , 2012, Interface Focus.

[35]  W. Bialek,et al.  Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  S. Sharma,et al.  The Fokker-Planck Equation , 2010 .

[38]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[39]  G. Parisi,et al.  Scale-free correlations in starling flocks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Christian A. Yates,et al.  Inherent noise can facilitate coherence in collective swarm motion , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Collective motion due to individual escape and pursuit response. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[42]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[44]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[46]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[47]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[48]  D. Goldman,et al.  Supplementary Materials for Collective clog control : Optimizing traffic flow in confined biological and robophysical excavation , 2018 .

[49]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .