Artificial Swarms find Social Optima : (Late Breaking Report)

in the natural world, many social species amplify their collective intelligence by forming real-time closed-loop systems. Referred to as Swarm Intelligence (SI), this phenomenon has been rigorously studied in schools of fish, flocks of birds, and swarms of bees. In recent years, technology has enabled human groups to form real-time closed-loop systems modeled after natural swarms and moderated by AI algorithms. Referred to as Artificial Swarm Intelligence (ASI), these methods have been shown to enable human groups to reach optimized decisions. The present research explores this further, testing if ASI enables groups with conflicting views to converge on socially optimal solutions. Results showed that “swarming” was significantly more effective at enabling groups to converge on the Social Optima than three common voting methods: (i) Plurality voting (i) Borda Count and (iii) Condorcet pairwise voting. While traditional voting methods converged on socially optimal solutions with 60% success across a test set of 100 questions, the ASI system converged on socially optimal solutions with 82% success (p<0.001).

[1]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  Optimal social choice functions: A utilitarian view , 2015, Artif. Intell..

[2]  I. Couzin Collective minds , 2007, Nature.

[3]  Elliot Anshelevich,et al.  Randomized Social Choice Functions under Metric Preferences , 2015, IJCAI.

[4]  T. Seeley,et al.  Choosing a home: how the scouts in a honey bee swarm perceive the completion of their group decision making , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  Louis Rosenberg Artificial Swarm Intelligence vs human experts , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[6]  Louis B. Rosenberg Human Swarms, a real-time method for collective intelligence , 2015, ECAL.

[7]  T. Seeley,et al.  Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the "best-of-N" decision rule? , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[9]  A. K. Basu A Theory of Decision-Making , 1973, The Journal of Sociology &amp; Social Welfare.

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[11]  Keith Michael Baker Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. M. le Marquis de CondorcetCondorcet. Mathématique et société. Roshdi Rashed , 1976 .

[12]  Thomas Schlegel,et al.  Stop Signals Provide Cross Inhibition in Collective Decision-making , 2022 .

[13]  Louis B. Rosenberg,et al.  Crowds vs swarms, a comparison of intelligence , 2016, 2016 Swarm/Human Blended Intelligence Workshop (SHBI).

[14]  F. Ratnieks Honeybee Democracy Thomas D. Seeley Honeybee Democracy , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.