Effectiveness of creativity training and its relation to selected personality factors

This exploratory study assesses the effectiveness of the Creative Problem Solving Program (Parnes, Noller and Biondi, 1977) for increasing the ideational fluency, flexibility and originality of trainees in a Master of Business Administration program. Pre- and post-training performances of trainees (N = 32) on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (verbal) are compared with a control group of MBA students (N = 44). Compared to the control group, trainees demonstrate significant gains in originality. While both groups show an improvement in fluency. Trainees with high preferences for achievement and dominance but low preference for deference are less likely than average to self-select for creativity training. Performance in a creativity project is positively related to preference for autonomy and creative ability, and negatively related to preference for achievement. Implications of these findings for the effectiveness of creativity training and the attitudes and performance of high need achievers are discussed. Finally, we discuss issues in the generalization and transfer of training to non-training domains.

[1]  G. Latham,et al.  Developing and Training Human Resources in Organizations , 1991 .

[2]  T. Rickards,et al.  Factors affecting brainstorming: towards the development of diagnostic tools for assessment of creative performance , 1988 .

[3]  Sanford L. Braver,et al.  Statistical Treatment of the Solomon Four-Group Design: A Meta-Analytic Approach , 1988 .

[4]  W. J. Altier From experience: A perspective on creativity , 1988 .

[5]  W. J. Altier A Perspective on Creativity , 1988 .

[6]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1988 .

[7]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[8]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Employee Health Management Programs: Review, Critique, and Research Agenda , 1987 .

[9]  George B. Graen,et al.  Training Effects on Attitudes Toward Divergent Thinking Among Manufacturing Engineers , 1986 .

[10]  S. Isaksen,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: The Basic Course , 1985 .

[11]  Laura Hall Rose,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Long‐Term Creativity Training Programs , 1984 .

[12]  E. Torrance,et al.  The criteria of success used in 242 recent experimental studies of creativity. , 1984 .

[13]  G. Graen,et al.  Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization , 1982 .

[14]  F. Barron,et al.  Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality , 1981 .

[15]  John B. Miner,et al.  Theories of organizational behavior , 1980 .

[16]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  THE ENTREPRENEURIAL PERSONALITY: A PERSON AT THE CROSSROADS , 1977 .

[17]  T. R Ickards,et al.  Brainstorming: An examination of idea production rate and level of speculation in real managerial situations , 1975 .

[18]  Harold J. Leavitt,et al.  Beyond the Analytic Manager: Part II , 1975 .

[19]  Harold J. Leavitt,et al.  Beyond the Analytic Manager , 1975 .

[20]  R. May,et al.  The Courage to Create , 1975 .

[21]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[22]  J. Guilford Three faces of intellect. , 1959 .

[23]  Bruce Quarrington,et al.  Edwards Personal Preference Schedule , 1956 .

[24]  A. Osborn Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .