Positioning accuracy assessment of a commercial RTK UAS

Though unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are widely used in agriculture, their current positioning accuracy in a radius of 0.5 to 2 meters is still too low to pinpoint a crop row or to precisely overlay temporal multi-source field maps together without a valid geometric calibration. The positioning accuracy of UAS deployed with real time kinematic (RTK) global navigation satellite system (GNSS) can be largely increased to a centimeter level, which was claimed from the manufacturers. This paper includes the preliminary test results of positioning accuracy of a commercial RTK UAS over a set of fixed position panels in our customized scenarios. Images were collected in three GNSS modes (regular GNSS without RTK, RTK mode 1 - not corrected by the positioning error of the base station, and RTK mode 2 - corrected by the positioning error of the base station) in static and in-flight settings. In the static setting, horizontal accuracies were 2.17 cm for the RTK mode 2, 12.11 cm for the RTK mode 1, and 11.46 cm for the regular GNSS mode. The significant result of horizontal accuracy in the in-flight setting was that RTK mode 2 without GCPs (2.82 cm) showed comparable accuracy with the commonly used regular GNSS mode with GCPs (1.34 cm). The vertical positioning accuracy in the static setting were 6.01 cm for the RTK mode 2, 5.65 cm for the RTK mode 1, and 10.48 cm for the regular GNSS mode. The accuracy of height measurement from digital surface models (DSMs) without and with GCPs in RTK mode 2 were 4.81 cm and 3.72 cm, respectively, which were the best performance among the three modes. In summary, the RTK UAS tested in this study showed great potential in eliminating the requirement of using GCPs and in high-positioning-accuracy application. The next phase is to test the system in field for accurate crop height measurement at different growth stages in agricultural application.

[1]  Ryan M. Watson,et al.  Flight-Test Evaluation of Kinematic Precise Point Positioning of Small UAVs , 2016 .

[2]  Alberto Pellegrinelli,et al.  USING DJI PHANTOM 4 RTK DRONE FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF COASTAL AREAS , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[3]  S. Sankaran,et al.  Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review , 2015 .

[4]  Chunhua Zhang,et al.  The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[5]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Nithya Rajan,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for High-Throughput Phenotyping and Agronomic Research , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Peter Surový,et al.  UAV RTK/PPK Method - An Optimal Solution for Mapping Inaccessible Forested Areas? , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[8]  M. A. Moreno,et al.  Applications of georeferenced high-resolution images obtained with unmanned aerial vehicles. Part I: Description of image acquisition and processing , 2014, Precision Agriculture.

[9]  Colin D. Woodroffe,et al.  Assessing Reef-Island Shoreline Change Using UAV-Derived Orthomosaics and Digital Surface Models , 2019, Drones.

[10]  He Zhang,et al.  Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection , 2019, Earth Surface Dynamics.