The degrees of freedom of compute-and-forward

We analyze the asymptotic behavior of compute-and-forward relay networks in the regime of high signal-to-noise ratios. We consider a section of such a network consisting of K transmitters and K relays. The aim of the relays is to reliably decode an invertible function of the messages sent by the transmitters. An upper bound on the capacity of this system can be obtained by allowing full cooperation among the transmitters and among the relays, transforming the network into a K × K multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel. The number of degrees of freedom of compute-and-forward is hence at most K. In this paper, we analyze the degrees of freedom achieved by the lattice coding implementation of compute-and-forward proposed recently by Nazer and Gastpar. We show that this lattice implementation achieves at most 2=(1+1=K) ≤ 2 degrees of freedom, thus exhibiting a very different asymptotic behavior than the MIMO upper bound. This raises the question if this gap of the lattice implementation to the MIMO upper bound is inherent to compute-and-forward in general. We answer this question to the negative by proposing a novel compute-and-forward implementation achieving K degrees of freedom.

[1]  M. Vetterli,et al.  On the capacity of large Gaussian relay networks , 2005 .

[2]  Emre Telatar,et al.  Capacity of Multi-antenna Gaussian Channels , 1999, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[3]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Uplink Macro Diversity of Limited Backhaul Cellular Network , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Loo Keng Hua,et al.  Introduction to number theory , 1982 .

[5]  Suhas N. Diggavi,et al.  The Approximate Capacity of the Gaussian $N$-Relay Diamond Network , 2013, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Sachin Katti,et al.  Embracing wireless interference: analog network coding , 2007, SIGCOMM.

[7]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Compute-and-Forward: Harnessing Interference Through Structured Codes , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Cooperative strategies and capacity theorems for relay networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  R. Gallager,et al.  The Gaussian parallel relay network , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (Cat. No.00CH37060).

[10]  Soung Chang Liew,et al.  Hot topic: physical-layer network coding , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[11]  Aria Nosratinia,et al.  The multiplexing gain of wireless networks , 2005, Proceedings. International Symposium on Information Theory, 2005. ISIT 2005..

[12]  G. A. Margulis,et al.  Khintchine-type theorems on manifolds: the convergence case for standard and multiplicative versions , 2001 .

[13]  Suhas N. Diggavi,et al.  Wireless Network Information Flow: A Deterministic Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Uri Erez,et al.  Achieving 1/2 log (1+SNR) on the AWGN channel with lattice encoding and decoding , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[15]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Hans-Andrea Loeliger,et al.  Averaging bounds for lattices and linear codes , 1997, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Abbas El Gamal,et al.  Capacity theorems for the relay channel , 1979, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  On the capacity of large Gaussian relay networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[19]  Young-Han Kim Capacity of a Class of Deterministic Relay Channels , 2008, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[20]  Wei Yu,et al.  Capacity of a Class of Modulo-Sum Relay Channels , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[21]  Victor Beresnevich,et al.  A Groshev Type Theorem for Convergence on Manifolds , 2002 .