Randomization in small sample surveys with the Halton sequence

Randomization has been widely used in surveys for various purposes such as within household respondent selection, rotation of questions and answer choices, and split sample (or ballot) technique for survey experiments. The randomization is usually based on a random number generating process whereby the computer generates random numbers which are then used to classify respondents in different groups. In this study, we use an alternative randomization based on the Halton sequence. The method is used in a survey with a political experiment which requires randomization of the political candidate’s characteristics. Our survey results demonstrate that the Halton sequence can be quite effective in randomly assigning respondents into groups, especially in surveys with small sample sizes

[1]  Erik Meijer,et al.  Internationally comparable health indices. , 2011, Health economics.

[2]  Chris McIntyre,et al.  The Effect of Economic Priorities on the Measurement of Value Change: New Experimental Evidence , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[3]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .

[4]  Leslie Kish,et al.  A Procedure for Objective Respondent Selection within the Household , 1949 .

[5]  R. Cools,et al.  Good permutations for deterministic scrambled Halton sequences in terms of L2-discrepancy , 2006 .

[6]  Harald Niederreiter,et al.  Implementation and tests of low-discrepancy sequences , 1992, TOMC.

[7]  K. Train,et al.  Forthcoming in the International Economic Review. , 2006 .

[8]  Steven Van de Walle,et al.  The order of questions in a survey on citizen satisfaction with public services: Lessons from a split-ballot experiment , 2011 .

[9]  C. Bhat.  Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model , 2001 .

[10]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  A Minimally Intrusive Method for Sampling Persons in Random Digit Dial Surveys , 2004 .

[11]  Fred L Mannering,et al.  Highway accident severities and the mixed logit model: an exploratory empirical analysis. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Panle Jia,et al.  What Happens When Wal‐Mart Comes to Town: An Empirical Analysis of the Discount Retailing Industry , 2008 .

[13]  C. Gaziano,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Within-Household Respondent Selection Techniques , 2005 .

[14]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  ASKING SENSITIVE QUESTIONS THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION MODE, QUESTION FORMAT, AND QUESTION CONTEXT , 1996 .

[15]  Erik Meijer,et al.  Health Indexes and Retirement Modeling in International Comparisons , 2008 .

[16]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[17]  R. Caflisch,et al.  Quasi-Monte Carlo integration , 1995 .

[18]  Olga V. Demler,et al.  The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R): design and field procedures , 2004, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[19]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  The Case for More Split‐Sample Experiments in Developing Survey Instruments , 2004 .

[20]  Marek J. Druzdzel,et al.  Computational Investigation of Low-Discrepancy Sequences in . . . , 2000 .

[21]  Abdoulaye Diop,et al.  Within-Household Sampling Conditioning on Household Size , 2013 .

[22]  Miriam D. Rosenthal,et al.  RESULTS FROM THE NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMIZATION SURVEY ( NCVS ) CATI EXPERIMENT , 2002 .

[23]  Milton I. Roemer,et al.  CHRONIC ILLNESS IN A RURAL AREA (Vol. III) , 1960 .

[24]  Dev K. Dalal,et al.  Experimental Comparisons of Methods for Reducing Deliberate Distortions to Self-Report Measures of Sensitive Constructs , 2016 .