Decay of an active GPCR: Conformational dynamics govern agonist rebinding and persistence of an active, yet empty, receptor state

Significance G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a major pharmaceutical drug target. However, one exception has been the visual photoreceptor rhodopsin, long considered “different” due to its covalently bound, light-sensitive retinal ligands. Here we demonstrate that, in contrast to prior assumptions, release of the agonist all-trans retinal (ATR) is not an irreversible process. Instead, during decay of the active species, ATR can rebind any rhodopsin remaining in an active-like conformation, and this active-like state can transiently persist even after agonist dissociation. These insights demonstrate rhodopsin behaves like other diffusible ligand-binding GPCRs and raise the possibility of treating rhodopsin by pharmaceutical agents. Here, we describe two insights into the role of receptor conformational dynamics during agonist release (all-trans retinal, ATR) from the visual G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) rhodopsin. First, we show that, after light activation, ATR can continually release and rebind to any receptor remaining in an active-like conformation. As with other GPCRs, we observe that this equilibrium can be shifted by either promoting the active-like population or increasing the agonist concentration. Second, we find that during decay of the signaling state an active-like, yet empty, receptor conformation can transiently persist after retinal release, before the receptor ultimately collapses into an inactive conformation. The latter conclusion is based on time-resolved, site-directed fluorescence labeling experiments that show a small, but reproducible, lag between the retinal leaving the protein and return of transmembrane helix 6 (TM6) to the inactive conformation, as determined from tryptophan-induced quenching studies. Accelerating Schiff base hydrolysis and subsequent ATR dissociation, either by addition of hydroxylamine or introduction of mutations, further increased the time lag between ATR release and TM6 movement. These observations show that rhodopsin can bind its agonist in equilibrium like a traditional GPCR, provide evidence that an active GPCR conformation can persist even after agonist release, and raise the possibility of targeting this key photoreceptor protein by traditional pharmaceutical-based treatments.

[1]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Allosteric coupling from G protein to the agonist binding pocket in GPCRs , 2016, Nature.

[2]  M. Zimmer,et al.  Activation of the A2A adenosine G-protein-coupled receptor by conformational selection , 2016, Nature.

[3]  D. Farrens,et al.  Structural dynamics and energetics underlying allosteric inactivation of the cannabinoid receptor CB1 , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  T. S. Kobilka,et al.  Structural Insights into the Dynamic Process of β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling , 2015, Cell.

[5]  D. Farrens,et al.  Conformational Selection and Equilibrium Governs the Ability of Retinals to Bind Opsin* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  D. Farrens,et al.  Distance Mapping in Proteins Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy: Tyrosine, like Tryptophan, Quenches Bimane Fluorescence in a Distance-Dependent Manner , 2014, Biochemistry.

[7]  Abhinav Sinha,et al.  Rhodopsin TM6 Can Interact with Two Separate and Distinct Sites on Arrestin: Evidence for Structural Plasticity and Multiple Docking Modes in Arrestin–Rhodopsin Binding , 2014, Biochemistry.

[8]  P. Garriga,et al.  Binding specificity of retinal analogs to photoactivated visual pigments suggest mechanism for fine-tuning GPCR-ligand interactions. , 2014, Chemistry & biology.

[9]  H. Tsukamoto,et al.  A Constitutively Activating Mutation Alters the Dynamics and Energetics of a Key Conformational Change in a Ligand-free G Protein-coupled Receptor* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Y. Shichida,et al.  Efficiencies of activation of transducin by cone and rod visual pigments. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[11]  A. Engel,et al.  Asymmetry of the rhodopsin dimer in complex with transducin , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[12]  D. Farrens,et al.  A Key Agonist-induced Conformational Change in the Cannabinoid Receptor CB1 Is Blocked by the Allosteric Ligand Org 27569* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Barry E Knox,et al.  Rapid release of retinal from a cone visual pigment following photoactivation. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[14]  K. Hofmann,et al.  Distinct loops in arrestin differentially regulate ligand binding within the GPCR opsin , 2012, Nature Communications.

[15]  Xavier Deupi,et al.  Stabilized G protein binding site in the structure of constitutively active metarhodopsin-II , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  D. Oprian,et al.  Preparation of an activated rhodopsin/transducin complex using a constitutively active mutant of rhodopsin. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[17]  V. Kefalov Rod and Cone Visual Pigments and Phototransduction through Pharmacological, Genetic, and Physiological Approaches* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  Krzysztof Palczewski,et al.  Chemistry and Biology of Vision* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  M. Heck,et al.  Alkylated hydroxylamine derivatives eliminate peripheral retinylidene Schiff bases but cannot enter the retinal binding pocket of light-activated rhodopsin. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[20]  P. Scheerer,et al.  Conserved Tyr223(5.58) plays different roles in the activation and G-protein interaction of rhodopsin. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  Oliver P. Ernst,et al.  Crystal structure of metarhodopsin II , 2011, Nature.

[22]  P. Reeves,et al.  Highly conserved tyrosine stabilizes the active state of rhodopsin , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  D. Farrens What site-directed labeling studies tell us about the mechanism of rhodopsin activation and G-protein binding , 2010, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[24]  B. Kobilka,et al.  Energy landscapes as a tool to integrate GPCR structure, dynamics, and function. , 2010, Physiology.

[25]  P. Scheerer,et al.  A G protein-coupled receptor at work: the rhodopsin model. , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[26]  A. Terakita,et al.  The Magnitude of the Light-induced Conformational Change in Different Rhodopsins Correlates with Their Ability to Activate G Proteins* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  R. Crouch,et al.  11-cis- and all-trans-retinols can activate rod opsin: rational design of the visual cycle. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[28]  Xavier Deupi,et al.  Conformational complexity of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 2007, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[29]  Xavier Deupi,et al.  Coupling ligand structure to specific conformational switches in the β2-adrenoceptor , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[30]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  Yang Xiang,et al.  Sequential binding of agonists to the beta2 adrenoceptor. Kinetic evidence for intermediate conformational states. , 2004, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  D. Farrens,et al.  Assessing structural elements that influence Schiff base stability: mutants E113Q and D190N destabilize rhodopsin through different mechanisms , 2003, Vision Research.

[33]  Manfred Burghammer,et al.  Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  D. Oprian,et al.  An opsin mutant with increased thermal stability. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[35]  R. Vogel,et al.  Conformations of the Active and Inactive States of Opsin* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  D. Farrens,et al.  Engineering a functional blue-wavelength-shifted rhodopsin mutant. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[37]  Y. Shichida,et al.  Visual pigment: G-protein-coupled receptor for light signals , 1998, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[38]  S. O. Smith,et al.  Constitutive activation of opsin by mutation of methionine 257 on transmembrane helix 6. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[39]  H. Khorana,et al.  Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin , 1996, Science.

[40]  K. Foster,et al.  Transducin Activation by the Bovine Opsin Apoprotein (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties of the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  T. Yoshizawa,et al.  Accessibility of the iodopsin chromophore. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[43]  G. Wald The Molecular Basis of Visual Excitation , 1968, Nature.

[44]  Ryan T. Strachan,et al.  reveal the dynamic range and diverse mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptor activation. , 2016 .