Measuring Transport Systems Efficiency Under Uncertainty by Fuzzy Sets Theory Based Data Envelopment Analysis: Theoretical and Practical Comparison with Traditional DEA Model

Abstract In transportation management the measure of systems efficiency is a key issue in order to verify the performances and propose the best countermeasure to achieve the prefixed goals. Many efforts have been made in this field to provide satisfactory answer to this problem. One of the most used methodologies is the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) that has been in many fields. The DEA technique is a useful is non-parametric method that allow to handle many output and input at the same time. In many real world applications, input and output data cannot be precisely measured. Imprecision (or approximation) and vagueness may be originated from indirect measurements, model estimation, subjective interpretation, and expert judgment or available information from different sources. Therefore, methodologies that allow the analyst to explicitly deal with imprecise or approximate data are of great interest, especially in freight transport where available data as well as stakeholders’ behavior often suffer from vagueness or ambiguity. This is particularly worrying when assessing efficiency with frontier-type models, such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models, since they are very sensitive to possible imprecision in the data set. In this paper, we have specified a Fuzzy Theory-based DEA model to assess efficiency of transportation systems and services considering uncertainty in data, as well as in the evaluation result. In particular, we have applied the proposed fuzzy DEA model to evaluate the efficiency of a selected set of international container ports. In particular, we focus on the “delay time” that is an important input data that is usually non easy to measure and then is considered as uncertain. Finally, a comparison of ports efficiency obtained by the proposed fuzzy DEA model and traditional DEA has been carried out in order to evaluate the differences between the two methods.

[1]  Maria Boile,et al.  ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES OF PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[2]  Byun-Gin Park An Efficiency Analysis for the Korea Container Terminals by the DEA/Simulation Approach , 2005 .

[3]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[4]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995) , 1996 .

[5]  Majid Soleimani-Damaneh,et al.  Computational and theoretical pitfalls in some current performance measurement techniques; and a new approach , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[6]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Frontier Tales: DEA and FDH , 1993 .

[7]  Chien-Chang Chou,et al.  A fuzzy MCDM method for solving marine transshipment container port selection problems , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[8]  M. Ottomanelli,et al.  Measuring Transport Systems Efficiency under Uncertainty by Fuzzy Sets Theory based Data Envelopment Analysis , 2014 .

[9]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , 1993 .

[10]  Wen-Chih Huang,et al.  PORT COMPETITIVENESS EVALUATION BY FUZZY MULTICRITERIA GRADE CLASSIFICATION MODEL , 2003 .

[11]  Katarina Vukadinović,et al.  Efficiency measurement of bulk cargo handling at river port using data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[12]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Devolution, port governance and port performance , 2007 .

[13]  Chien-Chang Chou,et al.  Application of FMCDM model to selecting the hub location in the marine transportation: A case study in southeastern Asia , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[14]  Rita Markovits-Somogyi,et al.  Measuring Efficiency in Transport: The State of the Art of Applying Data Envelopment Analysis , 2011 .

[15]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[16]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and improving container port efficiency , 2006 .

[17]  Ranko R. Nedeljkovic,et al.  Efficiency Measurement of Delivery Post Offices Using Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (Possibility Approach) , 2012 .

[18]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  A taxonomy for data envelopment analysis , 2004 .

[19]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Economic Efficiency of European Air Traffic Control Systems , 2014 .

[20]  Y Roll,et al.  Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 1993 .

[21]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[22]  P. De,et al.  An Alternative Approach to Efficiency Measurement of Seaports , 2004 .

[23]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Stochastic non-smooth envelopment of data: semi-parametric frontier estimation subject to shape constraints , 2012 .

[24]  S. Ganesalingam,et al.  An Evaluation of ASEAN Port Performance and Efficiency , 1994 .

[25]  Jie Wu,et al.  Groups in DEA based cross-evaluation: An application to Asian container ports , 2009 .

[26]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Data envelopment analysis using fuzzy concept , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 28th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple- Valued Logic (Cat. No.98CB36138).

[27]  J. Sengupta A fuzzy systems approach in data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[28]  Song Jae-Young,et al.  An Empirical Study on the Efficiency of Major Container Ports with DEA Model , 2005 .

[29]  Bruce W. Lamar,et al.  MEASURING TRANSIT PERFORMANCE USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[30]  J. Karebian Policy and practice. , 2015, The Michigan nurse.

[31]  Domenico Sassanelli,et al.  A fuzzy data meta training system for ranking hub container terminals , 2012 .

[32]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data , 2008 .

[33]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[34]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  L. C. Lin,et al.  Operational performance evaluation of major container ports in the Asia-Pacific region , 2007 .

[36]  A. Mugera Measuring Technical Efficiency of Dairy Farms with Imprecise Data: A Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2013 .

[37]  Francesco Russo,et al.  Container maritime transport on an international scale: data envelopment analysis for transhipment port , 2011 .

[38]  Jose L. Tongzon,et al.  Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[39]  C. Barros,et al.  Efficiency in European Seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal , 2004 .

[40]  Eduardo Martínez-Budría,et al.  A STUDY OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SPANISH PORT AUTHORITIES USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[41]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  COOPER-framework: A unified process for non-parametric projects , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Tengfei Wang,et al.  The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches , 2010, OR Spectr..

[43]  Shu-Cherng Fang,et al.  Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[44]  J. Tongzon THE IMPACT OF WHARFAGE COSTS ON VICTORIA'S EXPORT-ORIENTED INDUSTRIES , 1989 .

[45]  K. Cullinane,et al.  The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[46]  Domenico Sassanelli,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic-Based Methodology for Ranking Transport Infrastructures , 2011 .

[47]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility Theory - An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty , 1988 .

[48]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[49]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[50]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Fuzzy data envelopment analysis: A discrete approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[51]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[52]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .