Generalized approach to inverse problems in tomography: image reconstruction for spatially variant systems using natural pixels.

A major limitation in tomographic inverse problems is inadequate computation speed, which frequently impedes the application of engineering ideas and principles in medical science more than in the physical and engineering sciences. Medical problems are computationally taxing because a minimum description of the system often involves 5 dimensions (3 space, 1 energy, 1 time), with the range of each space coordinate requiring up to 512 samples. The computational tasks for this problem can be simply expressed by posing the problem as one in which the tomograph system response function is spatially invariant, and the noise is additive and Gaussian. Under these assumptions, a number of reconstruction methods have been implemented with generally satisfactory results for general medical imaging purposes. However, if the system response function of the tomograph is assumed more realistically to be spatially variant and the noise to be Poisson, the computational problem becomes much more difficult. Some of the algorithms being studied to compensate for position-dependent resolution and statistical fluctuations in the data acquisition process, when expressed in canonical form, are not practical for clinical applications because the number of computations necessary exceeds the capabilities of high-performance computer systems currently available. Reconstruction methods based on natural pixels, specifically orthonormal natural pixels, preserve symmetries in the data acquisition process. Fast implementations of orthonormal natural pixel algorithms can achieve orders of magnitude speedup relative to general implementations. Thus, specialized thought in algorithm development can lead to more significant increases in performance than can be achieved through hardware improvements alone.

[1]  Y. Censor,et al.  Parallel computing with block-iterative image reconstruction algorithms , 1991 .

[2]  A. Cormack Representation of a Function by Its Line Integrals, with Some Radiological Applications , 1963 .

[3]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Compensation for crystal penetration in high resolution positron tomography , 1988 .

[4]  David A. Fisher,et al.  Parallel Processing in Ada , 1986, Computer.

[5]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Alvin M. Despain,et al.  Very Fast Fourier Transform Algorithms Hardware for Implementation , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[7]  D. Luenberger Optimization by Vector Space Methods , 1968 .

[8]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Spatially variant tomographic imaging: estimation, identification, and optimization , 1992 .

[9]  R. Penrose A Generalized inverse for matrices , 1955 .

[10]  M. Goitein Three-dimensional density reconstruction from a series of two-dimensional projections , 1972 .

[11]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[12]  Peter C. Patton Multiprocessors: Architecture and Applications , 1985, Computer.

[13]  H. Trussell,et al.  Errors in Reprojection Methods in Computenzed Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  R. Marr,et al.  On the reconstruction of a function on a circular domain from a sampling of its line integrals , 1974 .

[15]  R Leahy,et al.  Applications of Markov random fields in medical imaging. , 1991, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[16]  A. Macovski,et al.  A Natural Pixel Decomposition for Two-Dimensional Image Reconstruction , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[18]  E. O. Brigham,et al.  The Fast Fourier Transform , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[19]  S. Deans The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications , 1983 .

[20]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Vayesian and Related Methods in Image Reconstruction from Incomplete Data , 1987 .

[21]  R. Huesman,et al.  Emission computed tomography , 1979 .

[22]  B. R. Hunt,et al.  Digital Image Restoration , 1977 .

[23]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Image Resampling on a Cylindrical Sector Grid , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  R J Jaszczak,et al.  Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Principles and instrumentation. , 1985, Investigative radiology.

[25]  G. Herman,et al.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  William G. Wee,et al.  On Methods of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction from a Set of Radioisotope Scintigrams , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[27]  Michael J. Quinn,et al.  Designing Efficient Algorithms for Parallel Computers , 1987 .

[28]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  An optimal technique for constraint-based image restoration and reconstruction , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[29]  S. Bellini,et al.  Compensation of tissue absorption in emission tomography , 1979 .

[30]  John R. Baker Macrotasking the singluar value decomposition of block circulant matrices on the Cray-2 , 1989, Proceedings of the 1989 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (Supercomputing '89).