User Service Innovation on Mobile Phone Platforms: Investigating Impacts of Lead Userness, Toolkit Support, and Design Autonomy

User participation is increasingly being seen as a way to mitigate the challenges that firms face in innovation, such as high costs and uncertainty of customer acceptance of their innovations. Thus, firms are establishing online platforms to support users in innovating services, such as iOS and Android platforms for mobile data service (MDS) innovation. Mobile phone platforms are characterized by technology (toolkits) and policy (rules) components that could influence user’s innovation. Additionally, attributes of user innovators (lead userness) are expected to drive their innovation behavior. Yet it is unclear how these characteristics jointly impact users’ service innovation outcomes. To address this knowledge gap, we propose a model that builds on user innovation theory and the work design literature to explain the influences of lead userness, design autonomy, toolkit support, and their interactions on user’s innovation outcomes (innovation quantity) on these platforms. We conceptualize toolkit support in terms of two constructs (i.e., ease of effort and exploration), and design autonomy in terms of three constructs (i.e., decision-making autonomy, scheduling autonomy, and work-method autonomy). The model was tested using survey and archival data from two dominant mobile phone platforms (i.e., iOS and Android). As hypothesized, lead userness, exploration through toolkits, and ease of effort through toolkits positively affect users’ innovation quantity. Additionally, decision-making autonomy and work-method autonomy influence innovation quantity, but scheduling autonomy does not. Further, the proposed three-way interactions between lead userness, toolkit support, and design autonomy constructs on users’ quantity of MDS innovation are largely supported. The findings enhance our understanding of user innovation on mobile phone platforms.

[1]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Direct and indirect knowledge spillovers: the “social network” of open-source projects , 2011 .

[2]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[3]  D. Vaus Analyzing social science data , 2002 .

[4]  Jun Sun,et al.  Investigating Value Co-Creation in Innovation of IT-enabled Services: An Empirical Study of Mobile Data Services , 2011, ICIS.

[5]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Developing successful technology‐based services: the issue of identifying and involving innovative users , 2006 .

[6]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[9]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Hoon Seok Choi,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Freemium Strategy for Mobile Apps: Evidence from the Google Play Market , 2012, ICIS.

[11]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Information systems success in free and open source software development: theory and measures , 2006, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[12]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[13]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[14]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[15]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  A Social Network Perspective of Lead Users and Creativity: An Empirical Study among Children , 2008 .

[16]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Managing User Involvement in Service Innovation , 2003 .

[17]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Comparing Potential and Actual Innovators: An Empirical Study of Mobile Data Services Innovation , 2015, MIS Q..

[18]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  New service development: learning from and with customers , 2004 .

[19]  Pamela D. Morrison,et al.  Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market , 2000 .