Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response.

Biologic scaffold materials composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) are routinely used for a variety of clinical applications. Despite known variations in tissue remodeling outcomes, quantitative criteria by which decellularization can be assessed were only recently described and as a result, the amount of retained cellular material varies widely among commercial products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of ineffective decellularization on the host response. Three different methods of decellularization were used to decellularize porcine small intestinal ECM (SIS-ECM). The amount of cell remnants was quantified by the amount and fragmentation of DNA within the scaffold materials. The M1/M2 phenotypic polarization profile of macrophages, activated in response to these ECM scaffolds, was assessed in vitro and in vivo using a rodent model of body wall repair. The results show that, in vitro, more aggressive decellularization is associated with a shift in macrophage phenotype predominance from M1 to M2. While this shift was not quantitatively apparent in vivo, notable differences were found in the distribution of M1 vs. M2 macrophages within the various scaffolds. A clear association between macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcome exists and effective decellularization remains an important component in the processing of ECM-based scaffolds.

[1]  T. Billiar,et al.  Systemic Inflammation and Liver Injury Following Hemorrhagic Shock and Peripheral Tissue Trauma Involve Functional TLR9 Signaling on Bone Marrow-Derived Cells and Parenchymal Cells , 2011, Shock.

[2]  J Hart,et al.  Inflammation. 1: Its role in the healing of acute wounds. , 2002, Journal of wound care.

[3]  P. Collinson,et al.  Plasma DNA concentration as a predictor of mortality and sepsis in critically ill patients , 2004, Critical Care.

[4]  S. Badylak,et al.  The Use of Extracellular Matrix as an Inductive Scaffold for the Partial Replacement of Functional Myocardium , 2006, Cell transplantation.

[5]  Milan Stevanovic,et al.  Reconstruction of large rotator cuff tendon defects with porcine small intestinal submucosa in an animal model. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[6]  S. Snyder,et al.  Histologic evaluation of a biopsy specimen obtained 3 months after rotator cuff augmentation with GraftJacket Matrix. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  Hui Xu,et al.  Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[8]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  The basement membrane component of biologic scaffolds derived from extracellular matrix. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[9]  P. Allavena,et al.  Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. , 2002, Trends in immunology.

[10]  N. Turner,et al.  Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[11]  S. Badylak,et al.  Enhanced bone regeneration using porcine small intestinal submucosa. , 1999, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[12]  S. Badylak,et al.  Macrophage participation in the degradation and remodeling of extracellular matrix scaffolds. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[13]  S. Werner,et al.  Wound repair and regeneration , 1994, Nature.

[14]  P. D. De Deyne,et al.  Bioscaffolds in tissue engineering: a rationale for use in the reconstruction of musculoskeletal soft tissues. , 2005, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[15]  E. Huri,et al.  USE OF PORCINE SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA IN BLADDER AUGMENTATION IN RABBIT: LONG‐TERM HISTOLOGICAL OUTCOME , 2008, ANZ journal of surgery.

[16]  Ernst Wolner,et al.  Tissue Engineering of Heart Valves: Decellularized Porcine and Human Valve Scaffolds Differ Importantly in Residual Potential to Attract Monocytic Cells , 2005, Circulation.

[17]  Silvano Sozzani,et al.  The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. , 2004, Trends in immunology.

[18]  S. Badylak,et al.  Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[19]  S. O'Kane Wound remodelling and scarring. , 2002, Journal of wound care.

[20]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software , 2011, Bioinform..

[21]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  Tissue-Engineered Myocardial Patch Derived From Extracellular Matrix Provides Regional Mechanical Function , 2005, Circulation.

[22]  M. Curtis,et al.  Early complications from the use of porcine dermal collagen implants (Permacol) as bridging constructs in the repair of massive rotator cuff tears. A report of 4 cases. , 2007, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[23]  S. Badylak,et al.  Reinforcement of esophageal anastomoses with an extracellular matrix scaffold in a canine model. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  W. Junger,et al.  Circulating Mitochondrial DAMPs Cause Inflammatory Responses to Injury , 2009, Nature.

[25]  S. Badylak,et al.  An extracellular matrix scaffold for esophageal stricture prevention after circumferential EMR. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[26]  J. Iannotti,et al.  Erratum to “Commercially available extracellular matrix materials for rotator cuff repairs: State of the art and future trends” [J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16(suppl):171S-178S] , 2009 .

[27]  Michael H. Metcalf,et al.  Surgical technique for xenograft (SIS) augmentation of rotator-cuff repairs , 2002 .

[28]  Ann E Rundell,et al.  Biaxial strength of multilaminated extracellular matrix scaffolds. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[29]  R. Clark Biology of dermal wound repair. , 1993, Dermatologic clinics.

[30]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[31]  Buddy D Ratner,et al.  The surface molecular functionality of decellularized extracellular matrices. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[32]  M. Goernig,et al.  Unsuccessful alloplastic esophageal replacement with porcine small intestinal submucosa. , 2009, Artificial organs.

[33]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  Decellularization of tissues and organs. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[34]  S. Wong,et al.  Macrophage polarization to a unique phenotype driven by B cells , 2010, European journal of immunology.

[35]  Ernst Wolner,et al.  Decellularization protocols of porcine heart valves differ importantly in efficiency of cell removal and susceptibility of the matrix to recellularization with human vascular cells. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[36]  E Wolner,et al.  Comparison of Different Decellularization Procedures of Porcine Heart Valves , 2003, The International journal of artificial organs.

[37]  S. Badylak,et al.  Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[38]  Alexander Huber,et al.  The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[39]  S. Badylak,et al.  Detrusor regeneration in the rat using porcine small intestinal submucosal grafts: functional innervation and receptor expression. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[40]  Kerry A. Daly,et al.  Biologic scaffolds for constructive tissue remodeling. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[41]  S. Badylak,et al.  Regenerative bladder augmentation: a review of the initial preclinical studies with porcine small intestinal submucosa. , 1995, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[42]  S. Badylak,et al.  Constructive remodeling of biologic scaffolds is dependent on early exposure to physiologic bladder filling in a canine partial cystectomy model. , 2010, The Journal of surgical research.

[43]  Jiake Xu,et al.  Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) is not an acellular collagenous matrix and contains porcine DNA: possible implications in human implantation. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[44]  George P McCabe,et al.  Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[45]  S. Nagata,et al.  Autoimmunity and the Clearance of Dead Cells , 2010, Cell.

[46]  G. Murrell,et al.  Restore orthobiologic implant: not recommended for augmentation of rotator cuff repairs. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[47]  R. Beelen,et al.  Macrophages in skin injury and repair. , 2011, Immunobiology.

[48]  R. Labow,et al.  In vitro response of monocyte-derived macrophages to a decellularized pericardial biomaterial. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[49]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  Quantification of DNA in biologic scaffold materials. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[50]  Thomas W. Gilbert,et al.  Esophageal preservation in five male patients after endoscopic inner-layer circumferential resection in the setting of superficial cancer: a regenerative medicine approach with a biologic scaffold. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[51]  J. Tidball,et al.  Regulatory interactions between muscle and the immune system during muscle regeneration. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[52]  L A Geddes,et al.  Small intestinal submucosa as a large diameter vascular graft in the dog. , 1989, The Journal of surgical research.

[53]  Amit Aurora,et al.  Commercially available extracellular matrix materials for rotator cuff repairs: state of the art and future trends. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[54]  R. Swaminathan,et al.  Overview of Circulating Nucleic Acids in Plasma/Serum , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Klod Kokini,et al.  Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device. , 2002, The Journal of surgical research.

[56]  Alberto Mantovani,et al.  Macrophage activation and polarization. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[57]  P. Jimenez,et al.  Tissue and cellular approaches to wound repair. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[58]  S. Badylak,et al.  The Th2-restricted immune response to xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa does not influence systemic protective immunity to viral and bacterial pathogens. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[59]  Stephen A. Brigido,et al.  Effective management of major lower extremity wounds using an acellular regenerative tissue matrix: a pilot study. , 2004, Orthopedics.

[60]  T. Churchill,et al.  Comparison of aortic valve allograft decellularization techniques in the rat. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[61]  Buddy D Ratner,et al.  Surface characterization of extracellular matrix scaffolds. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[62]  Stephen F. Badylak,et al.  The Effect of Range of Motion on Remodeling of Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS) When Used as an Achilles Tendon Repair Material in the Rabbit , 1997 .

[63]  R. Haut,et al.  Tissue-Engineered Rotator Cuff Tendon Using Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[64]  Artur Lichtenberg,et al.  Myocardial tissue engineering: the extracellular matrix. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[65]  A. R. Baker,et al.  Commercial extracellular matrix scaffolds for rotator cuff tendon repair. Biomechanical, biochemical, and cellular properties. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[66]  George P McCabe,et al.  Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[67]  D. Weber,et al.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for regeneration of a functioning musculotendinous junction. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[68]  S. Badylak,et al.  XENOGENEIC EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX GRAFTS ELICIT A TH2-RESTRICTED IMMUNE RESPONSE1 , 2001, Transplantation.

[69]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: free, versatile software for automated biological image analysis. , 2007, BioTechniques.

[70]  Kai-Nan An,et al.  Rotator cuff repair using an acellular dermal matrix graft: an in vivo study in a canine model. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.