Predicting tool operator capacity to react against torque within acceptable handle deflection limits in automotive assembly.

The proportion of tool operators capable of maintaining published psychophysically derived threaded fastener tool handle deflection limits were predicted using a biodynamic tool operator model, interacting with the tool, task and workstation. Tool parameters, including geometry, speed and torque were obtained from the specifications for 35 tools used in an auto assembly plant. Tool mass moments of inertia were measured for these tools using a novel device that engages the tool in a rotating system of known inertia. Task parameters, including fastener target torque and joint properties (soft, medium or hard), were ascertained from the vehicle design specifications. Workstation parameters, including vertical and horizontal distances from the operator were measured using a laser rangefinder for 69 tool installations in the plant. These parameters were entered into the model and tool handle deflection was predicted for each job. While handle deflection for most jobs did not exceed the capacity of 75% females and 99% males, six jobs exceeded the deflection criterion. Those tool installations were examined and modifications in tool speed and operator position improved those jobs within the deflection limits, as predicted by the model. We conclude that biodynamic tool operator models may be useful for identifying stressful tool installations and interventions that bring them within the capacity of most operators.

[1]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  Handle Dynamics Predictions for Selected Power Hand Tool Applications , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[2]  L Lindbeck,et al.  Pneumatic tool torque reaction: reaction forces, displacement, muscle activity and discomfort in the hand-arm system. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Power Hand Tool Kinetics Associated with Upper Limb Injuries in an Automobile Assembly Plant , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[4]  Jia-Hua Lin,et al.  Predicting subjective perceptions of powered tool torque reactions. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  B Lindqvist,et al.  Torque reaction in angled nutrunners. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Jia-Hua Lin,et al.  A single-degree-of-freedom dynamic model predicts the range of human responses to impulsive forces produced by power hand tools. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Jia-Hua Lin,et al.  Ergonomics Applications of a Mechanical Model of the Human Operator in Power Hand Tool Operation , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[8]  Steve Kihlberg,et al.  Discomfort from pneumatic tool torque reaction: Acceptability limits , 1995 .

[9]  Robert G. Radwin Chapter 6e – Biomechanical Aspects of Hand Tools , 2007 .

[10]  Seoungyeon Oh,et al.  A Mechanical Model of Hand Force in Power Hand Tool Operation , 1995 .

[11]  R G Radwin,et al.  The influence of target torque and torque build-up time on physical stress in right angle nutrunner operation. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[12]  T. G. Richard,et al.  Dynamic biomechanical model of the hand and arm in pistol grip power handtool usage , 2001 .

[13]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  Factors Influencing Power Hand Tool Fastening Accuracy and Reaction Forces , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[14]  T Armstrong,et al.  Muscle responses to simulated torque reactions of hand-held power tools. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[15]  L Lindbeck,et al.  Reaction forces, tool handle displacements and discomfort ratings during work with shut-off nutrunners. , 1994, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  T. Armstrong,et al.  Muscle response to pneumatic hand tool torque reaction forces. , 1989, Ergonomics.