Causal Evidence for a Mechanism of Semantic Integration in the Angular Gyrus as Revealed by High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

A defining aspect of human cognition is the ability to integrate conceptual information into complex semantic combinations. For example, we can comprehend “plaid” and “jacket” as individual concepts, but we can also effortlessly combine these concepts to form the semantic representation of “plaid jacket.” Many neuroanatomic models of semantic memory propose that heteromodal cortical hubs integrate distributed semantic features into coherent representations. However, little work has specifically examined these proposed integrative mechanisms and the causal role of these regions in semantic integration. Here, we test the hypothesis that the angular gyrus (AG) is critical for integrating semantic information by applying high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to an fMRI-guided region-of-interest in the left AG. We found that anodal stimulation to the left AG modulated semantic integration but had no effect on a letter-string control task. Specifically, anodal stimulation to the left AG resulted in faster comprehension of semantically meaningful combinations like “tiny radish” relative to non-meaningful combinations, such as “fast blueberry,” when compared to the effects observed during sham stimulation and stimulation to a right-hemisphere control brain region. Moreover, the size of the effect from brain stimulation correlated with the degree of semantic coherence between the word pairs. These findings demonstrate that the left AG plays a causal role in the integration of lexical-semantic information, and that high-definition tDCS to an associative cortical hub can selectively modulate integrative processes in semantic memory. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A major goal of neuroscience is to understand the neural basis of behaviors that are fundamental to human intelligence. One essential behavior is the ability to integrate conceptual knowledge from semantic memory, allowing us to construct an almost unlimited number of complex concepts from a limited set of basic constituents (e.g., “leaf” and “wet” can be combined into the more complex representation “wet leaf”). Here, we present a novel approach to studying integrative processes in semantic memory by applying focal brain stimulation to a heteromodal cortical hub implicated in semantic processing. Our findings demonstrate a causal role of the left angular gyrus in lexical-semantic integration and provide motivation for novel therapeutic applications in patients with lexical-semantic deficits.

[1]  S. Reeves,et al.  A pilot study of the tolerability and effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain perception. , 2011, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[2]  C. Honey,et al.  Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Fehr,et al.  Changing Social Norm Compliance with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Science.

[4]  J. Obleser,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over left angular gyrus modulates the predictability gain in degraded speech comprehension , 2015, Cortex.

[5]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  M. Hallett,et al.  A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  M. Grossman,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies Examining the Reliability of Effects on Language Measures , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[8]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  K. Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space , 2008, Brain Structure and Function.

[10]  Grant M. Walker,et al.  Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Noun–noun combination: Meaningfulness ratings and lexical statistics for 2,160 word pairs , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[12]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Organization of the Human Inferior Parietal Lobule Based on Receptor Architectonics , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[14]  C. Wernicke Der aphasische Symptomencomplex: Eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer Basis , 1874 .

[15]  D. McDermott LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT , 2012 .

[16]  G. Orban,et al.  Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Inferior Parietal Lobule Contributions to Visual Word Recognition , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  G. Woodman,et al.  The surprising temporal specificity of direct-current stimulation , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  M. Engelmann The Philosophical Investigations , 2013 .

[20]  M. Bikson,et al.  Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  J. Dejerine,et al.  Contribution a l'etude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des differentes varietes de cecite verbale , 2000 .

[22]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  D. Osherson,et al.  An early stage of conceptual combination: Superimposition of constituent concepts in left anterolateral temporal lobe , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[24]  D. V. Essen,et al.  Surface-Based and Probabilistic Atlases of Primate Cerebral Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[25]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Bikson,et al.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  V. Walsh,et al.  Modulating Neuronal Activity Produces Specific and Long-Lasting Changes in Numerical Competence , 2010, Current Biology.

[28]  T. Rogers,et al.  Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[30]  Michael F. Bonner,et al.  Where Is the Anterior Temporal Lobe and What Does It Do? , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[32]  P. Paz-Alonso,et al.  Combinatorial semantics strengthens angular-anterior temporal coupling , 2015, Cortex.

[33]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[35]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[36]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Automatic and Controlled Semantic Retrieval: TMS Reveals Distinct Contributions of Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus and Angular Gyrus , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Elston,et al.  The Pyramidal Cell in Cognition: A Comparative Study in Human and Monkey , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[39]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[40]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Neural correlates of implicit and explicit combinatorial semantic processing , 2010, NeuroImage.

[42]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Simple Composition: A Magnetoencephalography Investigation into the Comprehension of Minimal Linguistic Phrases , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Bikson,et al.  Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiency , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[45]  Michael F. Bonner,et al.  Converging Evidence for the Neuroanatomic Basis of Combinatorial Semantics in the Angular Gyrus , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  John W. Harwell,et al.  Similar patterns of cortical expansion during human development and evolution , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  C. Sherwood,et al.  A natural history of the human mind: tracing evolutionary changes in brain and cognition , 2008, Journal of anatomy.

[48]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[49]  Maarten Casteren,et al.  Match: A program to assist in matching the conditions of factorial experiments , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[50]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Creating Concepts from Converging Features in Human Cortex. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  R. Lindenberg,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days improves learning and maintenance of a novel vocabulary , 2014, Cortex.

[52]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Language Learning , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[54]  L. Parra,et al.  Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[55]  M. Seghier,et al.  Functional Subdivisions in the Left Angular Gyrus Where the Semantic System Meets and Diverges from the Default Network , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  Philip A. Cook,et al.  Heteromodal conceptual processing in the angular gyrus , 2013, NeuroImage.

[57]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[59]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[60]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  Lucas C Parra,et al.  Simulating pad-electrodes with high-definition arrays in transcranial electric stimulation , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[62]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Semantics of the Visual Environment Encoded in Parahippocampal Cortex , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  What the left and right anterior fusiform gyri tell us about semantic memory. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[64]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Brain Regions That Represent Amodal Conceptual Knowledge , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  L. Tyler,et al.  Representational Similarity Analysis Reveals Commonalities and Differences in the Semantic Processing of Words and Objects , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  H. Siebner,et al.  Dissociating Parieto-Frontal Networks for Phonological and Semantic Word Decisions: A Condition-and-Perturb TMS Study. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[67]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Probabilistic fibre tract analysis of cytoarchitectonically defined human inferior parietal lobule areas reveals similarities to macaques , 2011, NeuroImage.

[68]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  A pilot study on effects of 4×1 High-Definition tDCS on motor cortex excitability , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[69]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Semantic Processing in the Anterior Temporal Lobes: A Meta-analysis of the Functional Neuroimaging Literature , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Regional dendritic and spine variation in human cerebral cortex: a quantitative golgi study. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.