Investigating Optimal Time Step Intervals of Imaging for Data Quality through a Novel Fully-Automated Cell Tracking Approach

Computer-based fully-automated cell tracking is becoming increasingly important in cell biology, since it provides unrivalled capacity and efficiency for the analysis of large datasets. However, automatic cell tracking’s lack of superior pattern recognition and error-handling capability compared to its human manual tracking counterpart inspired decades-long research. Enormous efforts have been made in developing advanced cell tracking packages and software algorithms. Typical research in this field focuses on dealing with existing data and finding a best solution. Here, we investigate a novel approach where the quality of data acquisition could help improve the accuracy of cell tracking algorithms and vice-versa. Generally speaking, when tracking cell movement, the more frequent the images are taken, the more accurate cells are tracked and, yet, issues such as damage to cells due to light intensity, overheating in equipment, as well as the size of the data prevent a constant data streaming. Hence, a trade-off between the frequency at which data images are collected and the accuracy of the cell tracking algorithms needs to be studied. In this paper, we look at the effects of different choices of the time step interval (i.e., the frequency of data acquisition) within the microscope to our existing cell tracking algorithms. We generate several experimental data sets where the true outcomes are known (i.e., the direction of cell migration) by either using an effective chemoattractant or employing no-chemoattractant. We specify a relatively short time step interval (i.e., 30 s) between pictures that are taken at the data generational stage, so that, later on, we may choose some portion of the images to produce datasets with different time step intervals, such as 1 min, 2 min, and so on. We evaluate the accuracy of our cell tracking algorithms to illustrate the effects of these different time step intervals. We establish that there exist certain relationships between the tracking accuracy and the time step interval associated with experimental microscope data acquisition. We perform fully-automatic adaptive cell tracking on multiple datasets, to identify optimal time step intervals for data acquisition, while at the same time demonstrating the performance of the computer cell tracking algorithms.

[1]  Erik Meijering,et al.  Methods for cell and particle tracking. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  Wenqiang Feng,et al.  A mass-conservative adaptive FAS multigrid solver for cell-centered finite difference methods on block-structured, locally-cartesian grids , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[3]  G. Danuser,et al.  Integrin-dependent actomyosin contraction regulates epithelial cell scattering , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  K. Miura Tracking movement in cell biology. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[5]  Philipp J. Keller,et al.  Fast, high-contrast imaging of animal development with scanned light sheet–based structured-illumination microscopy , 2010, Nature Methods.

[6]  Thomas D. Pollard,et al.  Actin, a Central Player in Cell Shape and Movement , 2009, Science.

[7]  H. Schneckenburger,et al.  Light exposure and cell viability in fluorescence microscopy , 2012, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  Amit Gefen,et al.  A Method for Quick, Low-Cost Automated Confluency Measurements , 2011, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[9]  Charles Kervrann,et al.  Fast live simultaneous multiwavelength four-dimensional optical microscopy , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Nathalie Harder,et al.  A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms , 2014, Bioinform..

[11]  J. Swoger,et al.  Basic building units and properties of a fluorescence single plane illumination microscope. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[12]  Ping Lin,et al.  Mass conservative and energy stable finite difference methods for the quasi-incompressible Navier–Stokes–Cahn–Hilliard system: Primitive variable and projection-type schemes , 2017, 1703.06606.

[13]  P. Friedl,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[14]  Herbert Schneckenburger,et al.  Light Dose is a Limiting Factor to Maintain Cell Viability in Fluorescence Microscopy and Single Molecule Detection , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[15]  P. Zengel,et al.  μ-Slide Chemotaxis: A new chamber for long-term chemotaxis studies , 2011, BMC Cell Biology.

[16]  E. Horn,et al.  Chemotaxis of slow migrating mammalian cells analysed by video microscopy. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[17]  Ernst H K Stelzer,et al.  Light-sheet fluorescence microscopy for quantitative biology , 2014, Nature Methods.

[18]  G. Borisy,et al.  Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back , 2003, Science.

[19]  J. Steuber,et al.  Serine 26 in the PomB Subunit of the Flagellar Motor Is Essential for Hypermotility of Vibrio cholerae , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  Nathalie Harder,et al.  An Objective Comparison of Cell Tracking Algorithms , 2017, Nature Methods.

[21]  Chandrasekhar Venkataraman,et al.  A computational framework for particle and whole cell tracking applied to a real biological dataset. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  D. Schüler,et al.  Polarity of bacterial magnetotaxis is controlled by aerotaxis through a common sensory pathway , 2014, Nature Communications.

[23]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[24]  Thomas D Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[25]  John S. Condeelis,et al.  Chemotaxis in cancer , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[26]  D. Grier,et al.  Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies , 1996 .

[27]  Erik Sahai,et al.  The actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell motility , 2009, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[28]  Claire M. Brown,et al.  Live-cell microscopy – tips and tools , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[29]  D C Barber,et al.  Automated tracking of migrating cells in phase‐contrast video microscopy sequences using image registration , 2009, Journal of microscopy.

[30]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[31]  P. Hawkins,et al.  Moving towards a Better Understanding of Chemotaxis , 2008, Current Biology.

[32]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  Analysis of cell movement by simultaneous quantification of local membrane displacement and fluorescent intensities using Quimp2. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[33]  Roberto Mayor,et al.  Collective cell migration in development , 2016, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  Luigi Preziosi,et al.  Time‐dependent traction force microscopy for cancer cells as a measure of invasiveness , 2013, Cytoskeleton.

[35]  Ahmet Sacan,et al.  CellTrack: an open-source software for cell tracking and motility analysis , 2008, Bioinform..

[36]  A. Weeraratna,et al.  PI3K therapy reprograms mitochondrial trafficking to fuel tumor cell invasion , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  E. Manders,et al.  Controlled light-exposure microscopy reduces photobleaching and phototoxicity in fluorescence live-cell imaging , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Jason M Haugh,et al.  Directed migration of mesenchymal cells: where signaling and the cytoskeleton meet. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[39]  S. van de Linde,et al.  Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[40]  F. Grinnell Wound repair, keratinocyte activation and integrin modulation. , 1992, Journal of cell science.